Viewing Thread:
"OMFG - Lesbian has job !!!!1111smokercommiedarkiesout!!11112222"

So I'm skipping through a paper that I found yesterday. It happens to be the Daily Mail. And although the Daily Mail is a tireless campaigner for celebrity privacy, it just so happens to have a huge story on how David Beckham may or may not have had an affair - as if anyone in the whole entire World gives two sh*ts. But the main headline for the article, the bait used to entice the reader into their crummy little world of biased opinions and ill-informed "fact", was that the girl (Rebecca Loos) was a lesbian.

Now I hate the cult of celebrity worship, just as much as anyone who thinks they have a unique perspective of the Universe, but I read the article to see what the Daily Mail "journalists" had to say on the matter. And it turns out that not only is this girl a lesbian, but she has a tatoo that her parents don't know about! Oh. My. God. I'm sure she's sweating over that one. It actually disturbed me (but didn't surprise) that the paper would stoop so low in the queer-bashing stakes. It's almost as if they were punishing her for being gay.

So what if she enjoys sex and experiments a lot? The paper was using this as ammunition for the closet gay-bashers that read it, and want Kurds, Turks, Iraqis and Blacks out of Great Britain, to start some sort of hate campaign. And to top the idiocy of the whole article, the bit about the tatoo - as if it's important or relevant!? It was more blatant than FF's lack of religious knowledge. Which is very blatant indeed.

Fores**t Fan wrote:
> Hate is usually a bad thing.

Here's a hat, here's a pipe, now you look like Sherlock Holmes.

"Hate is usually a bad thing."

No sh*t, Sherlock! Stop trolling, you trolling troller!

By the way, why all the numbers in the title of this topic?

That's my secret code. It says "Forest Fan is a trolling buffoon".

Not really, it's like when idiots talk really fast and spit out saliva instead of words. That sort of thing, but in text form. I did try spitting on the screen, but the form wouldn't post it wet.

I thought it was to grab our attention.

Forest Fan wrote:
> Hate is usually a bad thing.
*****

Usually ?

I think anyone with a tattoo is obviously a drug user who has no respect whatsoever.

Timmargh wrote:
> I think anyone with a tattoo is obviously a drug user who has no
> respect whatsoever.
>
>

It all depends if your parents know about the tattoo. If they don't, then you're obviously a terrorist commie!!!!1111729

With deviant sexual tastes!

Like an asylum seeker article - 'Britain is a tolerant, law abiding, multi cultural society....' bla bla, and then all around it, articles depicting 'illegal immigrants storming', 'spreading like wildfire', 'metling into the countryside'.

Best of all, a story about a GP where most of his new patients were 'foreigners'........

monkey_man wrote:
> It all depends if your parents know about the tattoo. If they don't,
> then you're obviously a terrorist commie!!!!1111729
*****

In that case I was a terrorist commie for about a month.

Timmargh wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> Hate is usually a bad thing.
> *****
>
> Usually ?

Yep, hate is usually a bad thing.