The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Disclaimer.
(Not directed at forest fan specifically, but I've been thinking about religion a lot recently due to the trolls influence on these forums, apologies in advance for creating another thread of garbage, but hey, the idea below tickled me and kept me amused for a few minutes.)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ok, “god” created man in his own image, and is commonly assumed to be male. If that is so, answer me these following questions.
Is there a female “god” knocking around somewhere? Did he create a female “god” counterpart? Canhe create a female “god” counterpart? Is this against the rules as there can only be one true “god” according to the Christian faith?
If there is only one “god” and he’s male and equipped with a fully functional set of genitals (ohhh, naughty, talking about “gods” uglies) and therefore, by proxy, a sex drive, I can fully understand why he / it allows so much pain and suffering in the word.
He / it could get a bit tetchy after “self loving” for a couple of thousand millennia………………………
(Not directed at forest fan specifically, but I've been thinking about religion a lot recently due to the trolls influence on these forums, apologies in advance for creating another thread of garbage, but hey, the idea below tickled me and kept me amused for a few minutes.)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ok, “god” created man in his own image, and is commonly assumed to be male. If that is so, answer me these following questions.
Is there a female “god” knocking around somewhere? Did he create a female “god” counterpart? Canhe create a female “god” counterpart? Is this against the rules as there can only be one true “god” according to the Christian faith?
If there is only one “god” and he’s male and equipped with a fully functional set of genitals (ohhh, naughty, talking about “gods” uglies) and therefore, by proxy, a sex drive, I can fully understand why he / it allows so much pain and suffering in the word.
He / it could get a bit tetchy after “self loving” for a couple of thousand millennia………………………
Page:
Lindgren, Forest Fan will ignore you until you say he is correct.
That's what makes him hilarious. You can state the obvious and if he originally made a mistake, he'll stick to it :D
That's what makes him hilarious. You can state the obvious and if he originally made a mistake, he'll stick to it :D
Forest Fan wrote:
> The temperature of the sun is actually around 6,000C.
Then say surface temp in a statement like this, otherwise it isnt true and you'll just have me picking holes in it being the physicist/astronomer that I am! :p
> The temperature of the sun is actually around 6,000C.
Then say surface temp in a statement like this, otherwise it isnt true and you'll just have me picking holes in it being the physicist/astronomer that I am! :p
The surface temperature is!
Yet you still say the sun temperature is 6000C when clearly it is not.
That is what we have established, yes. :)
Forest Fan wrote:
> You didn't need to, but there you go.
Yes i did, the surface temp is nowhere near the average temp, which is kind of the "temperature of the sun"
> You didn't need to, but there you go.
Yes i did, the surface temp is nowhere near the average temp, which is kind of the "temperature of the sun"
Forest Fan wrote:
> The temperature of the sun is actually around 6,000C.
Surface temp, not average temp.
> The temperature of the sun is actually around 6,000C.
Surface temp, not average temp.
You didn't need to, but there you go.
Forest Fan wrote:
> Lindgren wrote:
> About the same as surface temp of Sun, nowhere near the same
> magnitude
> as the core temp, which is the really important one.
>
> I wasn't trying to say that.
I know you weren't. I was just pointing it out.
> Lindgren wrote:
> About the same as surface temp of Sun, nowhere near the same
> magnitude
> as the core temp, which is the really important one.
>
> I wasn't trying to say that.
I know you weren't. I was just pointing it out.
[URL]http://hypertextbook.com/facts/1997/GlyniseFinney.shtml[/URL] for proof.
Page: