The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Forest Fan. As I'm sure you're aware, you have created yourself as a target for people to throw their anti-Christianity remarks at.
So why is it, people aren't bad mouthing homosexuals all the time on here?
The reason being, you are continuously telling us we are all wrong to believe in what we choose to believe. We tell you are beliefs then you go and say, "Well what about when (insert your own religious belief for situation) occurs?" despite that being completely irrelevant.
We are choosing to be open minded. We all have beliefs. You believe you are right, Homosexuals believe they are right to be how they are, but there's one big difference:
Homosexuals aren't trying to force their beliefs down your throat.
Thankyou please. ( [URL]http://www.bigbrotheronline.co.uk/images/avid_merrion.jpg[/URL] )
So why is it, people aren't bad mouthing homosexuals all the time on here?
The reason being, you are continuously telling us we are all wrong to believe in what we choose to believe. We tell you are beliefs then you go and say, "Well what about when (insert your own religious belief for situation) occurs?" despite that being completely irrelevant.
We are choosing to be open minded. We all have beliefs. You believe you are right, Homosexuals believe they are right to be how they are, but there's one big difference:
Homosexuals aren't trying to force their beliefs down your throat.
Thankyou please. ( [URL]http://www.bigbrotheronline.co.uk/images/avid_merrion.jpg[/URL] )
Page:
Lindgren wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> >
>
> I don't, anyway if they are Homo-sexual, how do you know they won't
> be peverted?
>
> Anyway, if they are straight, how do you know they wont be
> perverted....
Don't, but I'm not Jonathan Nash said if they were gay, you would know they would not be peverted, but you don't know.
> Forest Fan wrote:
> >
>
> I don't, anyway if they are Homo-sexual, how do you know they won't
> be peverted?
>
> Anyway, if they are straight, how do you know they wont be
> perverted....
Don't, but I'm not Jonathan Nash said if they were gay, you would know they would not be peverted, but you don't know.
I also have the right to completely ignore my parents. They never cause me anything but heartache and trouble.
Lindgren wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
>
>
> Your parents are best suited to you.
>
> No they're bloody not! They don't know the meaning of the term
> "parental responsibility". You're very quick to make a
> judgement on people you dont even know FF.
Parents and children should always be together, they both have the rights to be together.
> Forest Fan wrote:
>
>
> Your parents are best suited to you.
>
> No they're bloody not! They don't know the meaning of the term
> "parental responsibility". You're very quick to make a
> judgement on people you dont even know FF.
Parents and children should always be together, they both have the rights to be together.
Forest Fan wrote:
> Hedfix wrote:
> I think Forest Fan could survive a nuclear war.
>
> Why?
Cockroaches, FF, cockroaches....
> Hedfix wrote:
> I think Forest Fan could survive a nuclear war.
>
> Why?
Cockroaches, FF, cockroaches....
Forest Fan wrote:
>
>
> I don't, anyway if they are Homo-sexual, how do you know they won't
> be peverted?
Anyway, if they are straight, how do you know they wont be perverted....
>
>
> I don't, anyway if they are Homo-sexual, how do you know they won't
> be peverted?
Anyway, if they are straight, how do you know they wont be perverted....
Forest Fan wrote:
> Jonathan Nash wrote:
> I' pretty sure if I was an orphan, I'd much rather be with a nice
> homosexual couple than with a bunch of annoying, teenage youths all
> day. They’re not going to rape me or convert me just because they're
> homosexual, FF.
>
> But a Homo-sexual couple would give you an inbalance of maternal and
> paternal upbringing. A man and woman are best suited to looking after
> a child.
these days a lot of kids dont have two parents anyway. A kid with 2 parents that care, regardless of their sexuality, is a very lukcy kid.
> Jonathan Nash wrote:
> I' pretty sure if I was an orphan, I'd much rather be with a nice
> homosexual couple than with a bunch of annoying, teenage youths all
> day. They’re not going to rape me or convert me just because they're
> homosexual, FF.
>
> But a Homo-sexual couple would give you an inbalance of maternal and
> paternal upbringing. A man and woman are best suited to looking after
> a child.
these days a lot of kids dont have two parents anyway. A kid with 2 parents that care, regardless of their sexuality, is a very lukcy kid.
Forest Fan wrote:
>
> Your parents are best suited to you.
No they're bloody not! They don't know the meaning of the term "parental responsibility". You're very quick to make a judgement on people you dont even know FF.
>
> Your parents are best suited to you.
No they're bloody not! They don't know the meaning of the term "parental responsibility". You're very quick to make a judgement on people you dont even know FF.
The world will be ended when the Lord destroys it with Holy Fire.
Hedfix wrote:
> I think Forest Fan could survive a nuclear war.
Why?
> I think Forest Fan could survive a nuclear war.
Why?
Ashman wrote:
> God created us. God gave us a mind. Surely he intended us to choose
> our own beliefs.
No, He intended us to follow Him and look after the animals.
> God created us. God gave us a mind. Surely he intended us to choose
> our own beliefs.
No, He intended us to follow Him and look after the animals.
Page: