The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
They all have to bombard us with their feelings of unfair treatment on this subject,but if we all approved then isn't it just like saying let there be no more genuine reproductions in the world?
Page:
Nostradamus claimed to have too....
Lindgren wrote:
> There are many books out there I'm sure that are fiction and just as
> "prophetic". Everyone and their dog seems to think they can
> predict the future of the planet these days.
But only the Bible can predict it thousands of years ago Lindgren.
> There are many books out there I'm sure that are fiction and just as
> "prophetic". Everyone and their dog seems to think they can
> predict the future of the planet these days.
But only the Bible can predict it thousands of years ago Lindgren.
There are many books out there I'm sure that are fiction and just as "prophetic". Everyone and their dog seems to think they can predict the future of the planet these days.
Lindgren wrote:
> Like that convinces me, I think the Bible is a work of fiction
> remember....
But the Bible has that in it. It's a seriously clever book and very prophetic if it is a "work of fiction" like you say.
> Like that convinces me, I think the Bible is a work of fiction
> remember....
But the Bible has that in it. It's a seriously clever book and very prophetic if it is a "work of fiction" like you say.
Like that convinces me, I think the Bible is a work of fiction remember....
Lindgren wrote:
> It sounds like an awful lot of guesswork to me.
Not really, the formula is in the Bible anyway.
> It sounds like an awful lot of guesswork to me.
Not really, the formula is in the Bible anyway.
It sounds like an awful lot of guesswork to me.
Lindgren wrote:
> I can tell you're never gonna have a lasting relationship FF....
Just answering the questions, though I think the scenario they presented me with, is unlikely.
> I can tell you're never gonna have a lasting relationship FF....
Just answering the questions, though I think the scenario they presented me with, is unlikely.
Lindgren wrote:
> I've read it and to be honest it sounds a bit far-fetched to me to try
> and pinpoint that to 1948. For a start it refers to at least one of
> the yesr given as being "about" whatever BC, in others
> they're not sure. It doesn't sound to me at all like anyone was
> prophesising the independence of Israel. The way you were talking
> about it I was expecting something a little more concrete and
> reliable.
It is concrete. It did happen in that year, all it is saying, is that although it took place that year, it spilled over slightly onto the next year, though not very much, so the year is STILL CORRECT.
> I've read it and to be honest it sounds a bit far-fetched to me to try
> and pinpoint that to 1948. For a start it refers to at least one of
> the yesr given as being "about" whatever BC, in others
> they're not sure. It doesn't sound to me at all like anyone was
> prophesising the independence of Israel. The way you were talking
> about it I was expecting something a little more concrete and
> reliable.
It is concrete. It did happen in that year, all it is saying, is that although it took place that year, it spilled over slightly onto the next year, though not very much, so the year is STILL CORRECT.
I can tell you're never gonna have a lasting relationship FF....
Page: