The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Wanna know how it's easy to spot?
"Being a Christian" - the massive thead that gave him this attention.
Where he talks about what being a Christian means.
Only now he's trying to claim being Jewish.
The shortest conversion in faith I've ever seen.
It doesn't matter who he really is, but the more you post to him, the more he'll maniacally beat-off whilst randomly stabbing keys with his headrod.
Let him go, talk about game/call each other names, but for the love of sanity don't indulge his pointless babblespeak
"Being a Christian" - the massive thead that gave him this attention.
Where he talks about what being a Christian means.
Only now he's trying to claim being Jewish.
The shortest conversion in faith I've ever seen.
It doesn't matter who he really is, but the more you post to him, the more he'll maniacally beat-off whilst randomly stabbing keys with his headrod.
Let him go, talk about game/call each other names, but for the love of sanity don't indulge his pointless babblespeak
Page:
(pop) I take it I've won that point then forest fan?
Forest Fan wrote:
> Well Pandaemonium, with no evidence against the Mark of the Beast, we
> can announce that the Mark of the Beast is officialy here.
Damn, it astounds me people like you can be so dumb. You have been proven wrong, you are trolling, and I've had enough for the time being.
Care to post your link to the concrete proof of the “mark of the beast”, which I can rip apart later at my leisure?
Remember, if it’s the idea that mondex is the "mark of the beast", I’ve already shown that that is total rubbish.
[edit]
Heres another: -
"Main point: the technology pictured above isn't the same as the technology described above."
[URL]http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bl_mondex_biochip.htm[/URL]
> Well Pandaemonium, with no evidence against the Mark of the Beast, we
> can announce that the Mark of the Beast is officialy here.
Damn, it astounds me people like you can be so dumb. You have been proven wrong, you are trolling, and I've had enough for the time being.
Care to post your link to the concrete proof of the “mark of the beast”, which I can rip apart later at my leisure?
Remember, if it’s the idea that mondex is the "mark of the beast", I’ve already shown that that is total rubbish.
[edit]
Heres another: -
"Main point: the technology pictured above isn't the same as the technology described above."
[URL]http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bl_mondex_biochip.htm[/URL]
Well Pandaemonium, with no evidence against the Mark of the Beast, we can announce that the Mark of the Beast is officialy here.
Forest Fan wrote:
> And I could direct you to a website, giving you concrete proof it is
> the Mark of the Beast, but that wouldn't really mean anything then.
What, you'd hold back from stuffing false info down our throats? That doesn't sound like the FF we've come to love so dearly.
What's the link to this "concrete proof", on the Internet, the source of all correct and true information everywhere?
*readies debunking stick*
> And I could direct you to a website, giving you concrete proof it is
> the Mark of the Beast, but that wouldn't really mean anything then.
What, you'd hold back from stuffing false info down our throats? That doesn't sound like the FF we've come to love so dearly.
What's the link to this "concrete proof", on the Internet, the source of all correct and true information everywhere?
*readies debunking stick*
Forest Fan wrote:
> Thanks for some more photos of the Mark of the Beast.
You have been owned little man.
Run along, but first I'll let you get your precious last word in.
.
.
.
.
.
You done? good. Run along.
> Thanks for some more photos of the Mark of the Beast.
You have been owned little man.
Run along, but first I'll let you get your precious last word in.
.
.
.
.
.
You done? good. Run along.
Thanks for some more photos of the Mark of the Beast.
Pandaemonium wrote:
> Forest Fan wrote:
> Yep, Pandaemonium that is the Mark of the Beast, all right.
>
> ?!?!?!?!?!? You are NOT listening. Read the article. It points out
> that what is being said about the technology being a chip in the hand
> is totally untrue. TOTALLY AND UTTERLY UNTRUE.
>
> You might as well try arguing "black is white"
>
> [URL]http://snopes.com/politics/business/mondex.asp[/URL]
And I could direct you to a website, giving you concrete proof it is the Mark of the Beast, but that wouldn't really mean anything then.
> Forest Fan wrote:
> Yep, Pandaemonium that is the Mark of the Beast, all right.
>
> ?!?!?!?!?!? You are NOT listening. Read the article. It points out
> that what is being said about the technology being a chip in the hand
> is totally untrue. TOTALLY AND UTTERLY UNTRUE.
>
> You might as well try arguing "black is white"
>
> [URL]http://snopes.com/politics/business/mondex.asp[/URL]
And I could direct you to a website, giving you concrete proof it is the Mark of the Beast, but that wouldn't really mean anything then.
Forest Fan wrote:
> Yep, Pandaemonium that is the Mark of the Beast, all right.
?!?!?!?!?!? You are NOT listening. Read the article. It points out that what is being said about the technology being a chip in the hand is totally untrue. TOTALLY AND UTTERLY UNTRUE.
You might as well try arguing "black is white"
[URL]http://snopes.com/politics/business/mondex.asp[/URL]
> Yep, Pandaemonium that is the Mark of the Beast, all right.
?!?!?!?!?!? You are NOT listening. Read the article. It points out that what is being said about the technology being a chip in the hand is totally untrue. TOTALLY AND UTTERLY UNTRUE.
You might as well try arguing "black is white"
[URL]http://snopes.com/politics/business/mondex.asp[/URL]
Yep, Pandaemonium that is the Mark of the Beast, all right.
This isn't Bible Code, this is directly mentioned in the book, hence it is not a secret Code, like the Bible Code is, which I don't agree with.
Page: