The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
A) you got the name wrong on your post Goatboy.
B) I'm not even looking at it, if you want to squabble then do it amongst yourselves.
B) I'm not even looking at it, if you want to squabble then do it amongst yourselves.
Page:
Thought people were still posting as it was towards the top of the page. Didn't look at the date.
Let me get this straight:
You pop this topic, nobody posted since the 26th and complain that people are needlessly arguing?
Why not just leave the topic alone, unless you're trying to whip it up but don't have the balls to add anything of your own?
Ass.
You pop this topic, nobody posted since the 26th and complain that people are needlessly arguing?
Why not just leave the topic alone, unless you're trying to whip it up but don't have the balls to add anything of your own?
Ass.
You twonks. Go and argue in chat instead of spamming up this forum.
Belldandy wrote:
=
> Translation for the non-liberals out there:
>
> "I wanna keep on squabbling so s*d off"
Heheheheh. He said, making a post purely designed to continue the squabbling....
Jesus...the mind of 8 year old and the body of a barrage balloon, not to mention the backed up, unused testes of a 21 (or so) year old virgin....it must absolutely SUCK to be you. I mean, how much contempt do your peers where you live hold you in, where your best shot at self respect is a board where you're continually held up and demonstrated to be a hypocritical coward with NO sense of humour?
=
> Translation for the non-liberals out there:
>
> "I wanna keep on squabbling so s*d off"
Heheheheh. He said, making a post purely designed to continue the squabbling....
Jesus...the mind of 8 year old and the body of a barrage balloon, not to mention the backed up, unused testes of a 21 (or so) year old virgin....it must absolutely SUCK to be you. I mean, how much contempt do your peers where you live hold you in, where your best shot at self respect is a board where you're continually held up and demonstrated to be a hypocritical coward with NO sense of humour?
Light wrote:
> Might I make a suggestion? Exercise your own personal censor. If you
> don't want to read about Bell, don't. If you want the decent topics
> to stay on the board, post in them yourself. Take some
> responsibility, and stop pointing the finger at someone, anyone else
> and trying to say that your gripe is their fault, 'kay?
Translation for the non-liberals out there:
"I wanna keep on squabbling so s*d off"
> Might I make a suggestion? Exercise your own personal censor. If you
> don't want to read about Bell, don't. If you want the decent topics
> to stay on the board, post in them yourself. Take some
> responsibility, and stop pointing the finger at someone, anyone else
> and trying to say that your gripe is their fault, 'kay?
Translation for the non-liberals out there:
"I wanna keep on squabbling so s*d off"
lalakersrule wrote:
>
> Well for one i didn't start it i, like quite alot of people around
> here, post replies to the latest Forest Fan rant and quote from the
> bible.
>
You didn't start it? Hmm...okay. Well guess what; I didn't start anything with Bell. So that makes it okay then?
Yes, it does sound like a rubbish justification doesn't it? "HE started it!" I mean for Gods sake...
However, you'll find that Hedfix, Sheepy, Blank...well, they've all posted replies to Bell as well. So it's looking more and more like you're only really annoyed cos the topics involving Bell are about things you're not interested in. Am I right?
>
>
> As opposed to the whole intelligent argument regarding Belldandy's
> weight?
I believe you'll find I've explained exactly why I'm doing that, thanks.
>
>
> Well not really seeing as your petty arguing pushes actual decent
> topics down the list (well the ones that have escaped your playground
> fighting) and so affects each user wishing to use this forum.
> Obviously my off hand remark about Forest Fan seems to have
> invalidated my opinion to you but the main message i was trying to
> get through was try not to make every topic a mini war between you
> lot.
Heh. So tell me Laker; doesn't it strike you as ironic that you're continuing a petty argument with me to prove your point about petty arguments? I mean look at that last paragraph; bearing in mind you've tried to be all scathing and mean about the jibes at Bell, here you are talking about 'playground fighting' and doing a pretty decent impersonation of someone who's had "scathing" described to him and is trying to recreate it from memory.
Might I make a suggestion? Exercise your own personal censor. If you don't want to read about Bell, don't. If you want the decent topics to stay on the board, post in them yourself. Take some responsibility, and stop pointing the finger at someone, anyone else and trying to say that your gripe is their fault, 'kay?
>
> Well for one i didn't start it i, like quite alot of people around
> here, post replies to the latest Forest Fan rant and quote from the
> bible.
>
You didn't start it? Hmm...okay. Well guess what; I didn't start anything with Bell. So that makes it okay then?
Yes, it does sound like a rubbish justification doesn't it? "HE started it!" I mean for Gods sake...
However, you'll find that Hedfix, Sheepy, Blank...well, they've all posted replies to Bell as well. So it's looking more and more like you're only really annoyed cos the topics involving Bell are about things you're not interested in. Am I right?
>
>
> As opposed to the whole intelligent argument regarding Belldandy's
> weight?
I believe you'll find I've explained exactly why I'm doing that, thanks.
>
>
> Well not really seeing as your petty arguing pushes actual decent
> topics down the list (well the ones that have escaped your playground
> fighting) and so affects each user wishing to use this forum.
> Obviously my off hand remark about Forest Fan seems to have
> invalidated my opinion to you but the main message i was trying to
> get through was try not to make every topic a mini war between you
> lot.
Heh. So tell me Laker; doesn't it strike you as ironic that you're continuing a petty argument with me to prove your point about petty arguments? I mean look at that last paragraph; bearing in mind you've tried to be all scathing and mean about the jibes at Bell, here you are talking about 'playground fighting' and doing a pretty decent impersonation of someone who's had "scathing" described to him and is trying to recreate it from memory.
Might I make a suggestion? Exercise your own personal censor. If you don't want to read about Bell, don't. If you want the decent topics to stay on the board, post in them yourself. Take some responsibility, and stop pointing the finger at someone, anyone else and trying to say that your gripe is their fault, 'kay?
Belldandy wrote:
>
> I like the way how the various threads regarding me managed to roll
> on despite me not even posting in them...worrying.
Yes, it's remarkable just how big a joke you actually are isn't it? Even when you're not here to humiliate, no-one can help poking fun at you...
>
> I like the way how the various threads regarding me managed to roll
> on despite me not even posting in them...worrying.
Yes, it's remarkable just how big a joke you actually are isn't it? Even when you're not here to humiliate, no-one can help poking fun at you...
Meh, how dare you suggest this forum is for anything more than playground squabbles.
Light wrote:
> So lets see if I've got this completely correct; it's okay for you to
> come in and start an argument because you only keep it to one
> comment. In other words, you don't do anything constructive, you just
> post something petty and then leave.
Well for one i didn't start it i, like quite alot of people around here, post replies to the latest Forest Fan rant and quote from the bible.
However, it's wrong for anyone
> to try and argue with someone else if that argument is going to go
> somewhere beyond "Hey, isn't Forest Fan stupid?"
As opposed to the whole intelligent argument regarding Belldandy's weight?
> Virtuallu every single topic? Would you like to do a count of how
> many topics on this board here now have arguments between Goaty,
> Bell, Sheepy, Hedfix, and I? There'll be about 5. Not really very
> many, is it?
5 topics is quite alot seeing as it usually ends up in the same argument. I may have been exaggerating to get a point across, however if we go back to the time of the Iraq war then "virtually every single topic" is quite accurate.
> Of course, you're quite entitled to express your opinions on what
> goes on between Bell and everyone else. However, as those opinions
> seem to spring from the same "Well I don't approve of this and
> therefore neither should anyone else" school of thought that
> Bell graduated from, you'll pardon me for using my entitlement to
> tell you that your complaint sorta loses any validity being as how
> it's solely concerned with you and how you feel.
Well not really seeing as your petty arguing pushes actual decent topics down the list (well the ones that have escaped your playground fighting) and so affects each user wishing to use this forum. Obviously my off hand remark about Forest Fan seems to have invalidated my opinion to you but the main message i was trying to get through was try not to make every topic a mini war between you lot.
> So lets see if I've got this completely correct; it's okay for you to
> come in and start an argument because you only keep it to one
> comment. In other words, you don't do anything constructive, you just
> post something petty and then leave.
Well for one i didn't start it i, like quite alot of people around here, post replies to the latest Forest Fan rant and quote from the bible.
However, it's wrong for anyone
> to try and argue with someone else if that argument is going to go
> somewhere beyond "Hey, isn't Forest Fan stupid?"
As opposed to the whole intelligent argument regarding Belldandy's weight?
> Virtuallu every single topic? Would you like to do a count of how
> many topics on this board here now have arguments between Goaty,
> Bell, Sheepy, Hedfix, and I? There'll be about 5. Not really very
> many, is it?
5 topics is quite alot seeing as it usually ends up in the same argument. I may have been exaggerating to get a point across, however if we go back to the time of the Iraq war then "virtually every single topic" is quite accurate.
> Of course, you're quite entitled to express your opinions on what
> goes on between Bell and everyone else. However, as those opinions
> seem to spring from the same "Well I don't approve of this and
> therefore neither should anyone else" school of thought that
> Bell graduated from, you'll pardon me for using my entitlement to
> tell you that your complaint sorta loses any validity being as how
> it's solely concerned with you and how you feel.
Well not really seeing as your petty arguing pushes actual decent topics down the list (well the ones that have escaped your playground fighting) and so affects each user wishing to use this forum. Obviously my off hand remark about Forest Fan seems to have invalidated my opinion to you but the main message i was trying to get through was try not to make every topic a mini war between you lot.
Heh.
The forums put you off your stroke. :D
(Damn that works on three, count them, levels!)
The forums put you off your stroke. :D
(Damn that works on three, count them, levels!)
Page: