The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Say the person who you hate the most and why.
Page:
Stranger In Paradise wrote:
>
> Ah, a civil servant then.....that's one step down from social
> worker.
So, the first personal attack of the post from the man who whinges like a tubbytitted brain donor whenever any are made against him.
>
> I'd again say, as I did in the Life forum, that you wouldn't have a
> clue what the course even involves.
Human geography? CBD's, migration patterns, population models...am I getting warm, or are you gonna try and say that there is SO much more to it than that>
>
> In fact I've come to the conclusion that the only reason Light
> attacks me for my appearance is because he can no longer attack my
> ideas, he wants to shift attention and acts like an utter fecking
> moron like the liberalised tw@t he is.
Mwahahahahahahaa!! Right, so the fact that I've torn asunder every argument you've ever put forward, and humiliated you at every turn...that doesn't occur to you?
Heh. Bell, the reason I'm attacking you for your appearence is cos I'm bored with making you cry by destroying your idea's, and i'm now working the same rather pathetic and immature angle that you always resort to; personal insults.
>
> Please note I have nothing against actual liberals, just Light's
> variety.
Bell, you don't even know what a liberal is. You only know it as an insult used by the Republicans.
>
> So sure, anyone feels like turning a topic I comment in into a
> slanging fest then Bring It On, I'm pretty sure the rest of
> the forum will be pi$$ed off but hey, who cares, it's your own
> personal schoolyard.
Heh. And, now what did I say again...oh yes;
>You'll also see that mostly, the only time any slanging matches develop >is when you get involved. Funny that, isn't it? Almost as if...as if you >show such a lack of respect to all the other posters here that they show >you the same contempt in response. Oh, but no; silly me. It's not you, >it's everyone else isn't it?
'Bring it on'? Large words from a coward who has now ran away from this board, never to return, on 4 occasions in the last year...
>
> Ah, a civil servant then.....that's one step down from social
> worker.
So, the first personal attack of the post from the man who whinges like a tubbytitted brain donor whenever any are made against him.
>
> I'd again say, as I did in the Life forum, that you wouldn't have a
> clue what the course even involves.
Human geography? CBD's, migration patterns, population models...am I getting warm, or are you gonna try and say that there is SO much more to it than that>
>
> In fact I've come to the conclusion that the only reason Light
> attacks me for my appearance is because he can no longer attack my
> ideas, he wants to shift attention and acts like an utter fecking
> moron like the liberalised tw@t he is.
Mwahahahahahahaa!! Right, so the fact that I've torn asunder every argument you've ever put forward, and humiliated you at every turn...that doesn't occur to you?
Heh. Bell, the reason I'm attacking you for your appearence is cos I'm bored with making you cry by destroying your idea's, and i'm now working the same rather pathetic and immature angle that you always resort to; personal insults.
>
> Please note I have nothing against actual liberals, just Light's
> variety.
Bell, you don't even know what a liberal is. You only know it as an insult used by the Republicans.
>
> So sure, anyone feels like turning a topic I comment in into a
> slanging fest then Bring It On, I'm pretty sure the rest of
> the forum will be pi$$ed off but hey, who cares, it's your own
> personal schoolyard.
Heh. And, now what did I say again...oh yes;
>You'll also see that mostly, the only time any slanging matches develop >is when you get involved. Funny that, isn't it? Almost as if...as if you >show such a lack of respect to all the other posters here that they show >you the same contempt in response. Oh, but no; silly me. It's not you, >it's everyone else isn't it?
'Bring it on'? Large words from a coward who has now ran away from this board, never to return, on 4 occasions in the last year...
Stranger In Paradise wrote:
> And you don't believe in anything Light, despite what you say, that's
> why Forest Fan (whether he is being serious or not) winds you up.
> Hell he threatens you...
Uhh...all I said was that the 'you don't believe' is a transparent baiting attempt. How d'you even know I take that as an insult?
Heheheheheheh. Still doing the baiting my dear boy? Yes, he winds me up. In case you hadn't noticed, he winds most people up. What, am I supposed to get haughty at this point and sniffily deny it. Jeez Bell, d'you think everyone is as humourless as you? As for whether he threatens me...okay, I'll play; how exactly does he threaten me?
> And you don't believe in anything Light, despite what you say, that's
> why Forest Fan (whether he is being serious or not) winds you up.
> Hell he threatens you...
Uhh...all I said was that the 'you don't believe' is a transparent baiting attempt. How d'you even know I take that as an insult?
Heheheheheheh. Still doing the baiting my dear boy? Yes, he winds me up. In case you hadn't noticed, he winds most people up. What, am I supposed to get haughty at this point and sniffily deny it. Jeez Bell, d'you think everyone is as humourless as you? As for whether he threatens me...okay, I'll play; how exactly does he threaten me?
ye
ßora† §agdiyeV wrote:
> But you were implying that personal insults don't offend anyone,
No...
> or shouldn't offend anyone,
Yes.
> when in many cases this just isn't true.
Hence the point of my post. Just don't pay heed to them. If it's what's inside that counts, why let insults at your outside bother you? I don't get it myself.
> But you were implying that personal insults don't offend anyone,
No...
> or shouldn't offend anyone,
Yes.
> when in many cases this just isn't true.
Hence the point of my post. Just don't pay heed to them. If it's what's inside that counts, why let insults at your outside bother you? I don't get it myself.
Blank wrote:
> The point of my post was not to take note of physical insults - just
> don't let it bother you. Ignore it or come up with your own.
But you were implying that personal insults don't offend anyone, or shouldn't offend anyone, when in many cases this just isn't true.
> The point of my post was not to take note of physical insults - just
> don't let it bother you. Ignore it or come up with your own.
But you were implying that personal insults don't offend anyone, or shouldn't offend anyone, when in many cases this just isn't true.
yeah, but then you could say in reply to a mental insult the "sticks and stones" phrase.
ßora† §agdiyeV wrote:
> that may be the case for most people - but some people take it very
> personally indeed. It's not always as easy as 'if you don't like
> what you've got, change it'.
The point of my post was not to take note of physical insults - just don't let it bother you. Ignore it or come up with your own.
> that may be the case for most people - but some people take it very
> personally indeed. It's not always as easy as 'if you don't like
> what you've got, change it'.
The point of my post was not to take note of physical insults - just don't let it bother you. Ignore it or come up with your own.
hahahahahahahahahaha!
happy belldandy (or whoever you really are!)
happy belldandy (or whoever you really are!)
Here was where I explained amd told Light;
"Hence you're making fun of someone whose weight is a result of an, at the time unknown, side effect of a poweful drug used to treat a childhood disease. The effect being that weight loss is made scores more difficult than it is for a person who was not treated with that drug, amongst other things. "
Remember to laugh.
"Hence you're making fun of someone whose weight is a result of an, at the time unknown, side effect of a poweful drug used to treat a childhood disease. The effect being that weight loss is made scores more difficult than it is for a person who was not treated with that drug, amongst other things. "
Remember to laugh.
Notorious Biggles wrote:
> and the eternal debate on how a cat with a piece
> of buttered toast on its back would land.
now who's been at the acid, NB? :)
> and the eternal debate on how a cat with a piece
> of buttered toast on its back would land.
now who's been at the acid, NB? :)
Page: