The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I have been looking to change my live for some time now. I looked around websites and came across here with excitement, after it was recommened by my friend who has signed up also.
I have been reading some of FOREST FAN's pieces, and he has ENLIGHTENED ME. I am now a Christian of the faith and beleive in the ONE TRUE LORD, ANNUBIS. Oh, wait. That's Stargate.
i beleive you should join me. FOREST FAN, I salute thee, for thou hath changeth my life.
Rejoice in the name of FAN.
I have been reading some of FOREST FAN's pieces, and he has ENLIGHTENED ME. I am now a Christian of the faith and beleive in the ONE TRUE LORD, ANNUBIS. Oh, wait. That's Stargate.
i beleive you should join me. FOREST FAN, I salute thee, for thou hath changeth my life.
Rejoice in the name of FAN.
Page:
LOL (at first post)
:^D
:^D
HEIL MEIN LORD!
Memorandum! wrote:
> Don't be silly, Thermodynamics proves Evolution wrong. You fool,
> Blank.
And laws of punctuation prove you wrong on this occasion. You fewl, Meemorandoom.
> Don't be silly, Thermodynamics proves Evolution wrong. You fool,
> Blank.
And laws of punctuation prove you wrong on this occasion. You fewl, Meemorandoom.
Don't be silly, Thermodynamics proves Evolution wrong. You fool, Blank.
*tuts*
*tuts*
I'm going to leave now. I'm not particularly religious (Though I can say that I hold Christian beliefs), but I can't take this crap much longer.
Holtey wrote:
> well evidence has been given an lets see what you can do to me
Bloody hell, talk properly and people might understand you. Acting like Scoper numero uno is hardly helping your case here.
As for evidence, and put in laymen's terms:
Bible 0
Science 5
> well evidence has been given an lets see what you can do to me
Bloody hell, talk properly and people might understand you. Acting like Scoper numero uno is hardly helping your case here.
As for evidence, and put in laymen's terms:
Bible 0
Science 5
"Oh. Your. God."
Holtey wrote:
> so you agree that they were black then and that we changed them
> white, cameroon still has its native people in it anyway that was
> never part of the empire, besides that in all the other countries
> there black because there in africa.
No, I don't. I'm saying that the population in these countries is still mostly black, apart from whites who stayed after the colonization era.
And Cameroon was part of the empire, albeit for not long, but it was controlled by the Germans and the French as well.
Bible characters are depicted as being white because they were. Make the connection, dingus.
> so you agree that they were black then and that we changed them
> white, cameroon still has its native people in it anyway that was
> never part of the empire, besides that in all the other countries
> there black because there in africa.
No, I don't. I'm saying that the population in these countries is still mostly black, apart from whites who stayed after the colonization era.
And Cameroon was part of the empire, albeit for not long, but it was controlled by the Germans and the French as well.
Bible characters are depicted as being white because they were. Make the connection, dingus.
Der Nazi wrote:
> Holtey wrote:
> what are you thinking we white people colonised these lands in roman
> times, e.g. the romans, which we are related too.Same as they came
> over here and colonisd us.
>
> They colonised the place, yes, but how could they have changed the
> colour of the skin of the locals? Look at what the population of
> Ghana, Uganda, Tanzania or Cameroon look like. They are all black,
> despite the fact that all of these territories were colonised by the
> British.
>
> We were colonised by the Romans, yes, but the only ways in which we
> changed were social. Your theory is a load of crap without real
> proof.
so you agree that they were black then and that we changed them white, cameroon still has its native people in it anyway that was never part of the empire, besides that in all the other countries there black because there in africa.
> Holtey wrote:
> what are you thinking we white people colonised these lands in roman
> times, e.g. the romans, which we are related too.Same as they came
> over here and colonisd us.
>
> They colonised the place, yes, but how could they have changed the
> colour of the skin of the locals? Look at what the population of
> Ghana, Uganda, Tanzania or Cameroon look like. They are all black,
> despite the fact that all of these territories were colonised by the
> British.
>
> We were colonised by the Romans, yes, but the only ways in which we
> changed were social. Your theory is a load of crap without real
> proof.
so you agree that they were black then and that we changed them white, cameroon still has its native people in it anyway that was never part of the empire, besides that in all the other countries there black because there in africa.
Holtey wrote:
> what are you thinking we white people colonised these lands in roman
> times, e.g. the romans, which we are related too.Same as they came
> over here and colonisd us.
They colonised the place, yes, but how could they have changed the colour of the skin of the locals? Look at what the population of Ghana, Uganda, Tanzania or Cameroon look like. They are all black, despite the fact that all of these territories were colonised by the British.
We were colonised by the Romans, yes, but the only ways in which we changed were social. Your theory is a load of crap without real proof.
> what are you thinking we white people colonised these lands in roman
> times, e.g. the romans, which we are related too.Same as they came
> over here and colonisd us.
They colonised the place, yes, but how could they have changed the colour of the skin of the locals? Look at what the population of Ghana, Uganda, Tanzania or Cameroon look like. They are all black, despite the fact that all of these territories were colonised by the British.
We were colonised by the Romans, yes, but the only ways in which we changed were social. Your theory is a load of crap without real proof.
Page: