> It's much harder, no stupid game breaker nonsense and I'm still
> yet to get a round in under par. BIG change from the 20 under
> par rounds of previous years.
I'll definitely be getting it then.
Tiger 05 is far too easy, 07 far too hard and to try and get it inbetween seems to evade programmers.
I play on Snooker 2004 on PS2 and the ones ranked out of the top 8 are easy to beat and miss stupidly easy pots where as the ones in the top 8 or so clear up every frame with one visit, there's no inbetween.
> Are you getting these ridiculously low scores on '07? - I hope
> not. That's jst too easy/
2005 for me, I might get 07 for a bit more of a challenge.
Problem is if it's too hard I'll probably throw a strop and stop playing it!
> Doesn't 06 have the Gamebreaker?
It does. In the hole from anywhere on the fairway, or a bionic tee shot.
I've steered away from '07 because I'm a little tired of the easiness. I want the tournements to be a bit more realistic - score-wise. Not birdie birdie eagle birdie eagle chip-in every iron to within two feet. There's no challenge. Gets repetitive.
But now I hear that 07 is harder ... according to Tiltawhirl.
> No more rounds of 52 in this game, I'm yet to do a round even > close to under par.
My record is 50.
I love the games but so far (up to '06) it's been way too easy - apart from maybe the fantasy courses and odd matchplay game.