The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
New series. The old geezer from The Sex Pistols, not funny to me. Lisa Tarbuck, hmm, there’s something dirty about her.
But I love it how he takes the mick out of the actual famous people.
Pubic gorilla.
ha ha ha
Read to post an acidic put-down? I'll use one of your examples then:
"It's just my opinion!"
It bugs me when people think that by saying that something is just their opinion that it excuses them from any argument? And swearing by trying to break the filter is rubbish, be more creative you badger-****y.
I have seen his dirty, stand-up tour - it's not hard to find on satellite TV. Which is essentially what you'd get on your Jim Davidson Live video.
And I hated every second. But whatever, it's all opinion.
> Maverick42 wrote:
> ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> so I doubted his videos would have anything to offer.
>
> Yes that sums you up, lets presume and take whatever GamesTM have to
> say. Shows how wrong you are.
I'm not looking for an argument, Ali.
What I've seen of Jim Davidson has been complete, unfiltered crap. Really. I gave him a chance but he's by far one of the worst things ever. Not just on TV. Ever. He's not even the slightest bit funny.
So am I going to buy his videos? Hell no. That's my opinion, which I'm entitled to - I'm not wrong.
And...
1. I don't have the money or time to buy every single game released, so I use gamesTM (who I trust, and more often than not agree with) and online reviews to decide what I'm going to by.
2. Before I will pass opinion on something, I will 99% of the time try it first. Otherwise it's not fair.
The thing is I don't stay glued to an online forum all day unlike some. Its called having a life.
> I don't remember reading I had to be quiet over anything when I
> regis**tered so when I feel something needs saying I will say it. Oh
> and I don't need to put my favourite word on the end of it, its clear
> from the amount of sheer bull sh*t you pos**t in General chat without
> having to explain.
That took you 53 minutes?
I knew you were slow, but come on...
> ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> so I doubted his videos would have anything to offer.
Yes that sums you up, lets presume and take whatever GamesTM have to say. Shows how wrong you are.