Viewing Thread:
"You've had your fun. Enough, now."

I come on today, after a two day absence. And all I get, out of nowhere, is bold, italic, and........line flying in my face. Like the opening sequence of Darkplace. Once or twice is fine, but it's in every post I've read.

And for the more predictable amongst you: go ahead and reply with one of the aforementioned new features, it won't be funny.

Blank wrote:
> L'Azul wrote:
> He is NOT saying he is against it.
> He is NOT saying it's a bad idea.
> He is NOT saying that it should be scrapped.
>
> *Nods*

Oh yes you are and I know you are

I like all of it, accept the underline thing.

L'Azul wrote:
> He is NOT saying he is against it.
> He is NOT saying it's a bad idea.
> He is NOT saying that it should be scrapped.

*Nods*

Clazon wrote:
> in your random thread in music, films, etc. you used it in conjunction
> with itallics... no need.
>
> (non tweaked) pointless rant (then in itallics)over.- would be most
> effective.
>
> the drumkit. it's just pointless here as you mention other
> instruments and you dont need to use underlining.

No, it was necessary you lesbian.
So there.

in your random thread in music, films, etc. you used it in conjunction with itallics... no need.

(non tweaked) pointless rant (then in itallics)over.- would be most effective.

the drumkit. it's just pointless here as you mention other instruments and you dont need to use underlining.



> i did say that i hadn't seen anyone use it WELL.

Clazon wrote:
> my post still stands. what the hell is the point in underlining. i
> haven't seen it used well once. why have bold and italics. you could
> be pedantic in their differences, but everyone was happy before and
> there was hardly anger that they weren't present.
>
> now it just helps JATs in their persuit for irritation. why couldn't
> we just have the hyperlinks. it may die down, but there's no real
> need.

I have to agree there, Clazon.

Clazon wrote:
> my post still stands. what the hell is the point in underlining. i
> haven't seen it used well once.

I've been using it frequently...

my post still stands. what the hell is the point in underlining. i haven't seen it used well once. why have bold and italics. you could be pedantic in their differences, but everyone was happy before and there was hardly anger that they weren't present.

now it just helps JATs in their persuit for irritation. why couldn't we just have the hyperlinks. it may die down, but there's no real need.

Emperor Xerxes wrote:
> I find it funny when JATs try to use it but end up with it looking a
> little like this

Eh?

I find it funny when JATs try to use it but end up with it looking a little like this