The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Pokemon Pearl'.
According to DScentral anyway:
> Two planned Pokemon titles for the DS, Pokemon Diamond and Pokemon Pearl,
> will feature online play according to Eurogamer. The titles will be shown
> off at this year's E3 less than a month away.
[URL]http://www.dscentral.net/[/URL]
> Two planned Pokemon titles for the DS, Pokemon Diamond and Pokemon Pearl,
> will feature online play according to Eurogamer. The titles will be shown
> off at this year's E3 less than a month away.
[URL]http://www.dscentral.net/[/URL]
Page:
Marinky_Kongshi wrote:
> Still, let's hope the new Gamecube Pokemon does better than
> Colloseum.
I like the top-down view yeh, hopefully it'll be kept in the DS versions. And I'm definately looking forward to the new Cube game which is apparently 100% proper RPG. If only Ninty had released such a game ages ago on the N64 when Pokémon was in it's prime.. they'd have made such a mint. Instead of Hey You Pikachu and the Stadiums.
> Still, let's hope the new Gamecube Pokemon does better than
> Colloseum.
I like the top-down view yeh, hopefully it'll be kept in the DS versions. And I'm definately looking forward to the new Cube game which is apparently 100% proper RPG. If only Ninty had released such a game ages ago on the N64 when Pokémon was in it's prime.. they'd have made such a mint. Instead of Hey You Pikachu and the Stadiums.
FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> But most of the new ones now just suck ass. They should cap it off,
> and actually let you get all of them in one game.
Aye, I never bother trading.. I'm not a kid who has friends who all have Gameboys and Pokémon any more so it would be kinda hard.
It would be good to get them all in one game. If you wanted all 386 in the GBA games you'd need to have/trade with: Sapphire, Ruby, Emerald, Leaf Green, Fire Red and Collosseum on the Cube.
> But most of the new ones now just suck ass. They should cap it off,
> and actually let you get all of them in one game.
Aye, I never bother trading.. I'm not a kid who has friends who all have Gameboys and Pokémon any more so it would be kinda hard.
It would be good to get them all in one game. If you wanted all 386 in the GBA games you'd need to have/trade with: Sapphire, Ruby, Emerald, Leaf Green, Fire Red and Collosseum on the Cube.
Tphi wrote:
> Marinky_Kongshi wrote:
> 2D was made for Pokemon.
>
> Come on, every Ninty fan's wet dream is a fully 3D proper adventure
> Pokémon game.
>
> Except Dringo, whose dream includes Peach in her Mario Tennis outfit.
The Pokemon Stadiums were pretty good. But ever since the Ruby and Saphire versions it all seemed to go downhill. I mean, Hey You Pikachu was no walk in the park either(except for huge Pokefans like my bro.) but nowadays they just keep churning out what they can think of. Not that that's neccessarily a bad thing. They've gotta make money somewhere. But they can at least, like you and probably Concept(if that's the name) have pointed out, they could at least take some more time to come up with more interesting Pokemon. Go on, [URL]http://217.158.191.136//ubbthreads/showthreaded.php? Cat=&Board=UBB5&Number=679847&page= 1&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&vc=1[/URL]!
I think no matter how polished and detailed the graphics are, they could never top the top-down 2D games(Pokemon that is).
Still, let's hope the new Gamecube Pokemon does better than Colloseum.
> Marinky_Kongshi wrote:
> 2D was made for Pokemon.
>
> Come on, every Ninty fan's wet dream is a fully 3D proper adventure
> Pokémon game.
>
> Except Dringo, whose dream includes Peach in her Mario Tennis outfit.
The Pokemon Stadiums were pretty good. But ever since the Ruby and Saphire versions it all seemed to go downhill. I mean, Hey You Pikachu was no walk in the park either(except for huge Pokefans like my bro.) but nowadays they just keep churning out what they can think of. Not that that's neccessarily a bad thing. They've gotta make money somewhere. But they can at least, like you and probably Concept(if that's the name) have pointed out, they could at least take some more time to come up with more interesting Pokemon. Go on, [URL]http://217.158.191.136//ubbthreads/showthreaded.php?
I think no matter how polished and detailed the graphics are, they could never top the top-down 2D games(Pokemon that is).
Still, let's hope the new Gamecube Pokemon does better than Colloseum.
Are you actually going to be able to catch them all this time?
Not whatever stupid amount was in the newest GBA games ... yeah! look at all the Pokémon! oh, by the way, you can only actually get 5 of them.
Some new Pokémon are good - the pre-evolution ones are pretty decent.
But most of the new ones now just suck ass. They should cap it off, and actually let you get all of them in one game.
Not whatever stupid amount was in the newest GBA games ... yeah! look at all the Pokémon! oh, by the way, you can only actually get 5 of them.
Some new Pokémon are good - the pre-evolution ones are pretty decent.
But most of the new ones now just suck ass. They should cap it off, and actually let you get all of them in one game.
Concept wrote:
> I've even got bored of the 2D now, 3D would just add a bit of "oh
> that looks good" for the fight scenes that would still wear out.
>
> Too many pokemon imo, 150 was nice, enough to know more or less each
> ones type when u saw them, have ur faves etc...but still enough for
> the people with too much time on their hands to collect them all :P
>
> Now it just seems like "wtf type pokemon is that", then it
> starts to feel the game wants too much of my life.
But wouldn't you get bored if it was just the same 151 over and over and over and over again?
> I've even got bored of the 2D now, 3D would just add a bit of "oh
> that looks good" for the fight scenes that would still wear out.
>
> Too many pokemon imo, 150 was nice, enough to know more or less each
> ones type when u saw them, have ur faves etc...but still enough for
> the people with too much time on their hands to collect them all :P
>
> Now it just seems like "wtf type pokemon is that", then it
> starts to feel the game wants too much of my life.
But wouldn't you get bored if it was just the same 151 over and over and over and over again?
The DS titles could do without adding another hundred Pokémon or so to the list. A couple new yeh, but not a huge amount.
I've even got bored of the 2D now, 3D would just add a bit of "oh that looks good" for the fight scenes that would still wear out.
Too many pokemon imo, 150 was nice, enough to know more or less each ones type when u saw them, have ur faves etc...but still enough for the people with too much time on their hands to collect them all :P
Now it just seems like "wtf type pokemon is that", then it starts to feel the game wants too much of my life.
Too many pokemon imo, 150 was nice, enough to know more or less each ones type when u saw them, have ur faves etc...but still enough for the people with too much time on their hands to collect them all :P
Now it just seems like "wtf type pokemon is that", then it starts to feel the game wants too much of my life.
Marinky_Kongshi wrote:
> 2D was made for Pokemon.
Come on, every Ninty fan's wet dream is a fully 3D proper adventure Pokémon game.
Except Dringo, whose dream includes Peach in her Mario Tennis outfit.
> 2D was made for Pokemon.
Come on, every Ninty fan's wet dream is a fully 3D proper adventure Pokémon game.
Except Dringo, whose dream includes Peach in her Mario Tennis outfit.
Tphi wrote:
> Marinky_Kongshi wrote:
> Tphi wrote:
> A 2D online handheld Pokémon game? It'll rip PSP sales
> to
> shreds.
>
> That sounds MUUUUUUCH better!
>
> The crappy 2D battle screen with simple graphical animations..
>
> or a fully 3D battle arena, the camera panning round as your
> Pokémon actually moves properly, rather than just being a
> near-static 2D image, only animating very simply.
Pokemon Red and Blue...
or Pokemon Colloseum.
2D was made for Pokemon.
> Marinky_Kongshi wrote:
> Tphi wrote:
> A 2D online handheld Pokémon game? It'll rip PSP sales
> to
> shreds.
>
> That sounds MUUUUUUCH better!
>
> The crappy 2D battle screen with simple graphical animations..
>
> or a fully 3D battle arena, the camera panning round as your
> Pokémon actually moves properly, rather than just being a
> near-static 2D image, only animating very simply.
Pokemon Red and Blue...
or Pokemon Colloseum.
2D was made for Pokemon.
JC941* wrote:
> As far as the series goes.. Silver is as far as I got so im not too
> sharp with the newer Pokemon sets, but im pretty sure I dont
> recognise that blue one being carried by the balloons on the packshot
> here..
>
> [URL]http://specialreserve.co.uk/Pokemon_3063_r.html[/URL]
It's Gonbe/Munchlax (Jap/US names) the pre-evolution of Snorlax and it doesn't appear in any of the regular games yet. It's the first new one for the DS era that'll presumbably be in Pokémon Pearl/Diamond.
Not that I'm a geek or anything.
*Runs*
> As far as the series goes.. Silver is as far as I got so im not too
> sharp with the newer Pokemon sets, but im pretty sure I dont
> recognise that blue one being carried by the balloons on the packshot
> here..
>
> [URL]http://specialreserve.co.uk/Pokemon_3063_r.html[/URL]
It's Gonbe/Munchlax (Jap/US names) the pre-evolution of Snorlax and it doesn't appear in any of the regular games yet. It's the first new one for the DS era that'll presumbably be in Pokémon Pearl/Diamond.
Not that I'm a geek or anything.
*Runs*
Page: