The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Yup. Very good. I won't bore every one with an aclomplishment speech.
Well, if you insist....
Well, if you insist....
Page:
Paradox: wrote:
> I thought you'd been here longer than me.
Same here.
> I thought you'd been here longer than me.
Same here.
I thought you'd been here longer than me.
I've been here nearly two years.
Hmph.
I've been here nearly two years.
Hmph.
Would i be classed as an oldie?
CGJ wrote:
> Darling wrote:
> you look good for 300!
>
> Why thank you.
>
> *poses*
not at all! my pleasure!
> Darling wrote:
> you look good for 300!
>
> Why thank you.
>
> *poses*
not at all! my pleasure!
Ah well ill put my age;
716
w00t!
716
w00t!
Darling wrote:
> you look good for 300!
Why thank you.
*poses*
> you look good for 300!
Why thank you.
*poses*
you look good for 300!
CGJ wrote:
> The zero's look good.
Good answer. I was expecting a "Get lost, loser!!!!11" type reply.
> The zero's look good.
Good answer. I was expecting a "Get lost, loser!!!!11" type reply.
Timmargh wrote:
> Well done, and all that, but why do people bother with these "I'm
> 300/600/1000" posts?
The zero's look good.
> Well done, and all that, but why do people bother with these "I'm
> 300/600/1000" posts?
The zero's look good.
I thought you were older then me, dont know why :S
Page: