Viewing Thread:
"xbox? PS2? NGC? confused??"

As the battle is on, the three console are wrestling each over to see which is best.

NGC: You just bought a nintendo game cube, and walk out of the shop. walking fast to your house, cant wait to play it? You might be happy that its very light, and look it even has a handle! But think for a sec, if a console is that light, it cannot have lots of things in it like Hard Drive. It might look smart,stylish compact and 100% portable. But for me, its the specificatoin that count!

PS2: You are jumping up and down, as you have bought one of the worlds well known consoles (which you would think is the best at that time). You would think of a PS2 to be a superb console, if its that famous. You might also think of the games its got. You might think you have got a bargain, and you could play with your friend or brother. But what if you want to play with them BOTH? you will need to have a multi tap which will cost quit a lot. It maybe stylish, well known, but the specifications MUCH better than NGC, but don't match xbox.

XboX: You have just bought your new xbox, and are running out and towards your home. You will realise that its a huge thing which weights alot. But its worth the paine to carry it home. It soppurts all kind of things, keyboard,live play, 4 players, and Hard Drives. You may think of xbox as this big huge black thingy, but its not like that. People have gone round and telling people all the bad bits of it. But out of these three consoles I think xbox is the best (many will dissagree) but it truely is in specification wise. As it has got 3X PS2 speed, about 2X NGC speed, The first console to have a built-in-hard drive, and the controllers are very easy to use when you get use to it.

Although many will dessagree, but I advies all of you to try xbox for a bit, on its best games and then compare it to PS2 and NGC with their best games. You will see the difference.

*weeps*

Dr. J Nash wrote:
> But it is. It's not just being biased; the fact is it really is more
> powerful.

THANK YOU, at least someone believes me

Kernal wrote:
As it has got
3X PS2 speed, about 7X NGC speed

I know it is, but this bit is wrong, like cookie said.

Gabriel Logan wrote:
> Kernal wrote:
> Kyle KataRn wrote:
> There is one other that would of beat them all but was shot down in
> 2001 (I think) and had all the qualities os xbox ps2 and ngc.
>
> If you can guess what it is there is a cash prize that dose'nt exist
> involved.
>
> Is it sega megadrive? (16-bit version)
> ohoh, or super nintendo?
>
> Dreamcast moron are you completely ignorant?

well you said a guess, thats what I were doing! I went far off, were I?

But it is. It's not just being biased; the fact is it really is more powerful.

Rickoss wrote:
> The Cube and PS2 both support keyboards, dunno about the 'Box.

OF course it does, you can buy it for £20 on SR

cookie monster wrote:
> Kernal wrote:
> As it has got
> 3X PS2 speed, about 7X NGC speed
>
> I VERY much doubt that the Xbox is 7* more powerful than the
> gamecube. From what you have said there you are saying the PS2 is
> more powerful than the Gamecube, everyone knows thats a load of baws.

I know where he got this from. When my friend bought his 'box he got this very biased leaflet with it, which had loads of graphs and charts showing how much better it is than the PS2 and 'Cube and I remeber reading this and laughing.

Kernal wrote:
> Kyle KataRn wrote:
> There is one other that would of beat them all but was shot down in
> 2001 (I think) and had all the qualities os xbox ps2 and ngc.
>
> If you can guess what it is there is a cash prize that dose'nt exist
> involved.
>
> Is it sega megadrive? (16-bit version)
> ohoh, or super nintendo?

Dreamcast moron are you completely ignorant?

Kernal, you really are seriously moronic.

Darwock wrote:
> X-box doesn't have progressive scan output
>
> X-box doesn't have a force feedback wheel
>
> X-box doesn't have any good games (heh heh)

Dont be nasty! of course it does