The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
http://blugg.com/stuff/foxs_view_of_the_bbc_player.htm
Page:
Like I say, I've only heard of him.
The fact still is that you'd (not you Blank) be an idiot to take his views as representative of the nation's view on a topic, because it is not, it is solely an opinion. That's what the Fox feature is, an opinion.
The fact still is that you'd (not you Blank) be an idiot to take his views as representative of the nation's view on a topic, because it is not, it is solely an opinion. That's what the Fox feature is, an opinion.
Belldandy wrote:
> Blank wrote:
> I assume you mean Littlejohn, not Little John?
>
> Yep, I've only ever seen trailers and heard of his column so I
> assumed that was how to spell it
Yeah, but it's his last name, not a nick name. He isn't a small person called John.
> Blank wrote:
> I assume you mean Littlejohn, not Little John?
>
> Yep, I've only ever seen trailers and heard of his column so I
> assumed that was how to spell it
Yeah, but it's his last name, not a nick name. He isn't a small person called John.
Blank wrote:
> I assume you mean Littlejohn, not Little John?
Yep, I've only ever seen trailers and heard of his column so I assumed that was how to spell it, but my point's still valid.
And Mouldy Cheese, that's not quite what happened. But if you want to put it like that well we're still doing that today except it's even worse because this time were making out like we care.
> I assume you mean Littlejohn, not Little John?
Yep, I've only ever seen trailers and heard of his column so I assumed that was how to spell it, but my point's still valid.
And Mouldy Cheese, that's not quite what happened. But if you want to put it like that well we're still doing that today except it's even worse because this time were making out like we care.
...thats racist.
Belldandy wrote:
> Alternatively explain that we were great about 150 years ago but we're
> now a pretty much directionless crap country with little identity and
> a penchant for credit.
Great? We went and killed little brown men with sticks.
> Alternatively explain that we were great about 150 years ago but we're
> now a pretty much directionless crap country with little identity and
> a penchant for credit.
Great? We went and killed little brown men with sticks.
LIAR. BEEB, EXAGERRATED
Belldandy wrote:
> Of course the other thing to bear in mind with Snuggly's link is that
> it's an OPINION section, like Little John on Sky. How many of you
> take Little John seriously? Exactly.
I assume you mean Littlejohn, not Little John?
> Of course the other thing to bear in mind with Snuggly's link is that
> it's an OPINION section, like Little John on Sky. How many of you
> take Little John seriously? Exactly.
I assume you mean Littlejohn, not Little John?
The next step is to become a state of America.
A cherry atop the depressed icing.
A cherry atop the depressed icing.
Alternatively explain that we were great about 150 years ago but we're now a pretty much directionless crap country with little identity and a penchant for credit.
Ms NY wrote:
> The British have bigger willy's so there's no problem
> there.
A bit off Topic here.
Next time an American, or anybody from another nation asks you, why is it called Great Britain?
Just answer with, if you see an Englishman naked, you'd understand why its called Great.
> The British have bigger willy's so there's no problem
> there.
A bit off Topic here.
Next time an American, or anybody from another nation asks you, why is it called Great Britain?
Just answer with, if you see an Englishman naked, you'd understand why its called Great.
Page: