The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Nicole Kidman and Tom Cruise split up about a month ago.
It has just been revealed that she has had a mis-carriage.
They struggled to have thier own kids and had to adopt.
It now appears obvious that it wasn't her with the problem, and Tom is firing blanks.
Her pregnancy is a good reason to split up, so the question is:
Who planted the seed?
meka_dragon: Celebrity Gossip S**t!
It has just been revealed that she has had a mis-carriage.
They struggled to have thier own kids and had to adopt.
It now appears obvious that it wasn't her with the problem, and Tom is firing blanks.
Her pregnancy is a good reason to split up, so the question is:
Who planted the seed?
meka_dragon: Celebrity Gossip S**t!
Page:
Maybe he only had 'A Few Good Men', if you know what I mean.
Days of Thunder, nights of damp fog patches.
Risky Busin... actually, no.
'All the Right Moves' ?
Nope, obviously not.
Nope, obviously not.
The 'Firm' ?
...I think not!!
...I think not!!
Mission Impossible, eh?
Surely there a coctail joke here somewhere....
S'ok, I got my humour back now, coffee is a wonderful thing.
So, Tom Cruise, Top Gun, eh?
So, Tom Cruise, Top Gun, eh?
Damn right, but whilst there are people out there buying Hello magazine, celebrities are going to be hounded by the media.
They are just normal people, and really their lives aren't that interesting, but that said, they are in the public eye, and when something does happen it will get gossiped about in just the same way as 'that girl down the road' by old ladies on street corners.
And if we can suggest that a major Hollywood star is firing blanks, then jokes will be made at his expense, just as you joke about things that happen to people you know.
They are just normal people, and really their lives aren't that interesting, but that said, they are in the public eye, and when something does happen it will get gossiped about in just the same way as 'that girl down the road' by old ladies on street corners.
And if we can suggest that a major Hollywood star is firing blanks, then jokes will be made at his expense, just as you joke about things that happen to people you know.
You've raised a whole bag of moral and ethical issues with this one, and as I've lost my sense of humour temporarily I'm going to explain my ideas about this without ranting but still trying to get these points across in an unbiased way.
Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman are human beings like the rest of us, the only difference is that they are known world wide for their acting abilities, and now their breakup.
Personally, I would be very affronted to have my marriage life splattered all over the tabloids, all over the web, all over the gossip magazines and all over the media in general. I would class that as part of my private life, something that was left to me after I had given everything else to the world.
So I think there should be limits to exactly how much we know about celebrities and how deep we delve into their private lives. The press say that the public have a 'right to know'. Do we? If any of us suddenly hit the limelight would we agree with that?
The papparrazi have gone way to far in the past, and will continue to do so, recent fiascos been trying to get a picture of 'Madonna and child', following George Clooney about in speedboats whilst he was on a yachting holiday, and trying to gain access to the Cruise/Kidman medical files.
Just how much the press think we need to know about our favorite celebrities is beyond me, do they actually have limits? It seems not.
These celebrities have enriched our lives, the least we can do is afford them a right to privacy rather than force the public's scrutiny upon them.
FM: Too early in the morning for a sense of humour.
(Maybe I should come back later?)
Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman are human beings like the rest of us, the only difference is that they are known world wide for their acting abilities, and now their breakup.
Personally, I would be very affronted to have my marriage life splattered all over the tabloids, all over the web, all over the gossip magazines and all over the media in general. I would class that as part of my private life, something that was left to me after I had given everything else to the world.
So I think there should be limits to exactly how much we know about celebrities and how deep we delve into their private lives. The press say that the public have a 'right to know'. Do we? If any of us suddenly hit the limelight would we agree with that?
The papparrazi have gone way to far in the past, and will continue to do so, recent fiascos been trying to get a picture of 'Madonna and child', following George Clooney about in speedboats whilst he was on a yachting holiday, and trying to gain access to the Cruise/Kidman medical files.
Just how much the press think we need to know about our favorite celebrities is beyond me, do they actually have limits? It seems not.
These celebrities have enriched our lives, the least we can do is afford them a right to privacy rather than force the public's scrutiny upon them.
FM: Too early in the morning for a sense of humour.
(Maybe I should come back later?)
Page: