The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This is the flame thread, if you wish to flame in the future, please copy and paste the remarks you found offensive in another thread, and have it out here.
FM: Great thinking, Great threads, Intelligent suits.
FM: Great thinking, Great threads, Intelligent suits.
Page:
Your Honour wrote:
> Intelligence Quotient.
You already answered the question. I could have said 'Intelligence Quotient' but I was posting derogatory remarks about the Nintendo in another thread at the time so you beat me to it.
However, I would like to say in my defence that 'I knew that'.
> Intelligence Quotient.
You already answered the question. I could have said 'Intelligence Quotient' but I was posting derogatory remarks about the Nintendo in another thread at the time so you beat me to it.
However, I would like to say in my defence that 'I knew that'.
FM, you still havent said what the letters I Q stand for.
IQ = (Mental Age divided by Actual Age) x 100
My actual age at the time of the test was 32, my mental age at the time of the test was 51.5, therefore my IQ was calculated at 161.
It also means that I am now mentally retired. :-)
My actual age at the time of the test was 32, my mental age at the time of the test was 51.5, therefore my IQ was calculated at 161.
It also means that I am now mentally retired. :-)
Intelligence Quotient.
Damn!!!
:-)
:-)
*FM pulls out Mensa certificate which clearly states that he has an IQ of 161*
*FM points out to Your Honour that infinately is actually spelt infinitely*
*FM points out to Your Honour that Your Honour has once again replied to one of FM's posts, thereby proving yet another of his points*
*FM rests his case and awaits the jury's verdict*
*FM also puts the smiley :-) in this post to indicate that this is not a real flame, it is a well known fact that only Meka_Dragon and Nintendo fans are capable of producing real flames*
I havent seen your suits so i cant comment.
You replying to your own post with "pop" hardly constitutes a witty, clever, and grown up response which is what i feel is needed in these forums.
Your claim that because you wrote them means that they are intelligent is a purely subjective matter and is therefore infinately debatable, and subsequently over-ruled.
You replying to your own post with "pop" hardly constitutes a witty, clever, and grown up response which is what i feel is needed in these forums.
Your claim that because you wrote them means that they are intelligent is a purely subjective matter and is therefore infinately debatable, and subsequently over-ruled.
Page: