The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
My apologies for any confusion here. I am ssxpro.
I used the name Shedao Shai because I was bored of writing the same old reviews, with the same old structure. As a result I decided to think up a new way to review a game. I remembered reading about Shedao Shai and his hate of machines, and decided it would be fun to review a game, pretending to be him. Though the character would never do such a thing, it was possible to make the story believable in a sort of Sci-fi way.
The whole review was based around the idea that the Yuuzhan Vong could use the game to train themselves, even though they hate technology. It was a crazy idea, but I very much enjoyed thinking up ideas to put in it. The bit that was quoted by SR about music was one of my favourite parts.
After writing the review, the name had made an impression on me, and I thought it would be nice to continue with it. I am sorry to those who thought I was messing around and playing guessing games with people, it wasn`t intended to be a joke.
I will stay as both Shedao Shai and ssxpro. I like both names, and will use them in a similar way to Grix uses two names. (Obviously not as parts of one body, but you know what I mean).
Again, sorry, but the review wouldn`t have had the same effect if written by ssxpro.
I used the name Shedao Shai because I was bored of writing the same old reviews, with the same old structure. As a result I decided to think up a new way to review a game. I remembered reading about Shedao Shai and his hate of machines, and decided it would be fun to review a game, pretending to be him. Though the character would never do such a thing, it was possible to make the story believable in a sort of Sci-fi way.
The whole review was based around the idea that the Yuuzhan Vong could use the game to train themselves, even though they hate technology. It was a crazy idea, but I very much enjoyed thinking up ideas to put in it. The bit that was quoted by SR about music was one of my favourite parts.
After writing the review, the name had made an impression on me, and I thought it would be nice to continue with it. I am sorry to those who thought I was messing around and playing guessing games with people, it wasn`t intended to be a joke.
I will stay as both Shedao Shai and ssxpro. I like both names, and will use them in a similar way to Grix uses two names. (Obviously not as parts of one body, but you know what I mean).
Again, sorry, but the review wouldn`t have had the same effect if written by ssxpro.
Page:
damospud wrote:
> your honour, alls fair in love and winning on gameaday!
Thats true, good luck to you mate, i hope we dont post attempts on the same day, or one of us will end up in tears. And it wont be me.
:-)
> your honour, alls fair in love and winning on gameaday!
Thats true, good luck to you mate, i hope we dont post attempts on the same day, or one of us will end up in tears. And it wont be me.
:-)
Attempts whatever this is here to talk gaming......now where's everybody gone.
Lol! That was a half attempt, i was testing the water, so to speak, to see how people reacted to that style of post.
I told you, as soon as i wont to win, when i know 100% i'll win, then i'll post.
Am i the only person on here who isnt actually that bothered if they win gameaday or not?
I told you, as soon as i wont to win, when i know 100% i'll win, then i'll post.
Am i the only person on here who isnt actually that bothered if they win gameaday or not?
You have tried with that scummy hard drive post. :D
No Sniper i havent won yet. Ive been posting for less than 3 weeks and i havent tried properly yet. Believe me, when i try, i intend to win :-)
Give a chance for the rest of us, and plz check apocs cheating post!
Quote frm gameaday.co.uk:
"Winning contributions are likely to be witty, informative or useful"
Im notg having a go at you damo, if you have already won 3 times, whats the problem? Im my opinion it is fair if someone wins twice in 1 week, if their post was the best of the day. I dont read all the posts every day so i cant comment, but obviously tony or ali or jo or who ever obviously preferred someone elses to yours.
I appricate you looking out for people like me who havent won.
"Winning contributions are likely to be witty, informative or useful"
Im notg having a go at you damo, if you have already won 3 times, whats the problem? Im my opinion it is fair if someone wins twice in 1 week, if their post was the best of the day. I dont read all the posts every day so i cant comment, but obviously tony or ali or jo or who ever obviously preferred someone elses to yours.
I appricate you looking out for people like me who havent won.
One line no offence but have you won yet?
Page: