The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
the one in the third is leading a band of homeless people, as they break into a supermarket. when an ED-209 comes out and starts shouting threats at them, she plugs her laptop into its leg, and reprogrammes it. yes, it's as crap as it sounds.
those japanese ninja robots were ok, until (shock, horror) they are reprogrammed to fight each other at the end of the film, by the same kid.
At that point complete despair came over me, but the worst was yet to come - robocop with a jetpack. what can I say?
> It's terrible - I mean from the start you have a KID reprogramming an
> ED-209. It really went downhill from there.
>
> And you're right about Home Alone. 1+2 are great, 3 = complete
> crap.
>
> there are very few films with kids in I can stomach. McCauley Culkin
> just manages to pull of being funny though.
Yeah, he was great. Ah, yes, the kid in Robocop 3. He gets killed anyway :0D
> "2 great films"....
>
>
>
> wahahahahahahaha
>
--
Much the same thought from me.
And you're right about Home Alone. 1+2 are great, 3 = complete crap.
there are very few films with kids in I can stomach. McCauley Culkin just manages to pull of being funny though.
> I think the psychology of box sets is that if you like one of the
> films, you are quite likely to fork out the extra for the set, even
> if the other films are a bit cack.
Well, I mean, what's the point? If it's a choice between Home Alone 1/2 for £11.99 or 1,2 and 3 for £15, I'll pick the former, as what's the point for forking out £3 for a film you'll never watch?
>
> why, just the other day I nearly bought the hellraiser box set,
> before i realised that the third one is crap.
>
> I bought the robocop one a while ago and haven't even watched the
> third one.
Well, it's the worst of the three. He has a bloody jetpack...
> OPLAR wrote:
> You've had it almost two weeks and haven't watched it yet!? What the
> hell are you on!?
>
> I've been busy socialising and baby sitting.
>
Still, surely you can fit in 105 minutes to watch this pretty good film.
>
> OPLAR wrote:
> Lemme guess, you already bought Fellowship and TT, but you're gonna
> buy them AGAIN in this glorious box set?
>
> Actually: no, I haven't already bought them. I did consider it but
> then I noticed that Fellowship Of The Ring is shown regularly on Sky
> Premiere and I borrowed Two Towers of the missus' sister and watched
> it a few times. Come to think of it, I may need to borrow it again
> ...
Good man.
why, just the other day I nearly bought the hellraiser box set, before i realised that the third one is crap.
I bought the robocop one a while ago and haven't even watched the third one.
> You've had it almost two weeks and haven't watched it yet!? What the
> hell are you on!?
I've been busy socialising and baby sitting.
OPLAR wrote:
> Lemme guess, you already bought Fellowship and TT, but you're gonna
> buy them AGAIN in this glorious box set?
Actually: no, I haven't already bought them. I did consider it but then I noticed that Fellowship Of The Ring is shown regularly on Sky Premiere and I borrowed Two Towers of the missus' sister and watched it a few times. Come to think of it, I may need to borrow it again ...