The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Which is the best out of these titles?
Page:
No.
The Harry Potter books are brilliant but the movies are dull.
The Lord of the Rings books are dull but the movies are brilliant.
The Lord of the Rings books are dull but the movies are brilliant.
Hm, well it's LOTR in every sense. Anyone who tells you otherwise really should be ashamed of themselves.
Harry Potter books are well-written in the way that they are engrossing and magical for children/teens, yet they lack a certain originality, spark and imagination that is apparent in books like LOTR. I don't dislike Harry Potter (I own them all), but the franchise seriously is overrated. Phillip Pullman, Roald Dahl and Terry Pratchett have produced superior pieces of literature - with so much more variation. No doubt JK Rowling has talent, but one refined Harry Potter book would have been sufficient. She cannot seem to break away from one thing; she just doesn't seem creative enough to be among the greats.
Tolkein, however, IS great. He was everything a brilliant writer should be and thus produced some exempliary work. He is better in every sense. LOTR is epic. As are the films, whereas Harry Potter movies are poorly acted, terribly directed and, in a word, dull.
Harry Potter books are well-written in the way that they are engrossing and magical for children/teens, yet they lack a certain originality, spark and imagination that is apparent in books like LOTR. I don't dislike Harry Potter (I own them all), but the franchise seriously is overrated. Phillip Pullman, Roald Dahl and Terry Pratchett have produced superior pieces of literature - with so much more variation. No doubt JK Rowling has talent, but one refined Harry Potter book would have been sufficient. She cannot seem to break away from one thing; she just doesn't seem creative enough to be among the greats.
Tolkein, however, IS great. He was everything a brilliant writer should be and thus produced some exempliary work. He is better in every sense. LOTR is epic. As are the films, whereas Harry Potter movies are poorly acted, terribly directed and, in a word, dull.
Without doubt Lord Of The Rings, (movie wise). But for a girl who's 12 years old, she might not be too interested in Lord Of The Rings. But what do I know...
I think I'll go for LOTR, Slice pointed me in the right direction, thanks!
lord of the rings rocks man the games are goooood
Mystique, what's funny?!
Ready wrote:
> Young, I'm 18!
*****
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
> Young, I'm 18!
*****
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Auf deutsch wrote:
> Well how old is your sister?
She is 12!
> Well how old is your sister?
She is 12!
Page: