The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I think SR should make an area that only truely respected memebers can go to, so they dont get spammed or rubish topics made by noobs. It would make it alot better. Bacause number 1, people will try to make better posts to get into this place. and number 2, we will have a decent place to go to.
I think the people should be voted in to it or something. or snug decides who is worthy.
What do you think?
I think the people should be voted in to it or something. or snug decides who is worthy.
What do you think?
Page:
Gígž wrote:
> jim-hat wrote:
> Shut up, you're looser.
>
>
> You spelt loser wrong.
Ha, Gigz.
(You ball-licker)
> jim-hat wrote:
> Shut up, you're looser.
>
>
> You spelt loser wrong.
Ha, Gigz.
(You ball-licker)
OK thanks m8.
jim-hat wrote:
> Shut up, you're looser.
You spelt loser wrong.
> Shut up, you're looser.
You spelt loser wrong.
Shut up, you're looser.
Chad Niga
"Shut up you loser"
"Shut up you loser"
Oh, and you're a moronic classist fool.
That's an utterly stupid idea.
What do you mean by "respected regulars"?
If you mean regulars, basically, then the Newbies will just spam the other forums to get the Regular status.
If you mean what I think you mean, it'd just mean a whole load of debating over the definition of a respected regular, and "ooh, 'x' spams, he shouldn't be allowed in here" etc. It'd also mean having to concoct some kind of system to decide how you are regarded as a "respected" regular.
A Notable-esque voting system would be pointlessly crap, and would cause more bother than it's worth, and the staff deciding wouldn't make the staff best too pleased, as they've enough to do as it is.
What do you mean by "respected regulars"?
If you mean regulars, basically, then the Newbies will just spam the other forums to get the Regular status.
If you mean what I think you mean, it'd just mean a whole load of debating over the definition of a respected regular, and "ooh, 'x' spams, he shouldn't be allowed in here" etc. It'd also mean having to concoct some kind of system to decide how you are regarded as a "respected" regular.
A Notable-esque voting system would be pointlessly crap, and would cause more bother than it's worth, and the staff deciding wouldn't make the staff best too pleased, as they've enough to do as it is.
Are there that many annoying newbies around at th moment?
Very_Metal wrote:
> or, you could stop sounding so elitist, get off your high horse and
> realise that everyone has to start somewhere
You bet. There is an awful stench of a closed club around here a lot of the time. Maybe if new posters were welcomed we see a difference. Remember - to become a regular all you have to do is post 300 messages, there's no "quality" aspect there. Even talking about the quality of someone's posts is distasteful, everyone's allowed a voice. Using yours to complain adds nothing to the forums.
> or, you could stop sounding so elitist, get off your high horse and
> realise that everyone has to start somewhere
You bet. There is an awful stench of a closed club around here a lot of the time. Maybe if new posters were welcomed we see a difference. Remember - to become a regular all you have to do is post 300 messages, there's no "quality" aspect there. Even talking about the quality of someone's posts is distasteful, everyone's allowed a voice. Using yours to complain adds nothing to the forums.
Damn right.
Page: