The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Give me questions for Tony.
I'm going for an 'audience' with him, representing 16-24 year olds.
Any questions you want to ask him?
Quick.
Quick.
Quick.
Too many British ones just can't be arsed, they may have come for the education, but they stay for the time wasting, non-working and any old certificate at the end of it.
That's not to cast a generalisation over all students, but there are a lot (or were at my uni) who are like that, and it spoils it for everyone else. In a similar way to how you think feoreign studnets bring the standard down for you.
Whereas foreign students bring some diversity to the area, and IMO, have as much right to be there as any other students. For the most part they are of sufficient ability, otherwise they wouldn't have been accepted.
Secondly, though I'm sure they bring in more money than "home" students, foreigners can be a masive burden in terms of additional tuition and unnecessary information in notes, lectures. For example, we were given a thick handout recently to help us write a forthcoming essay/presentation - but instead of concentrating on things like presentation of words, style, concise writing - we get patronising advice on how to put full stops at the end of sentences, all for the foreigners - and in particular - the Chinese, which seem to be a major contingent in our department because of some Northern-Pacific consortium crap.
And they also make a fair bit of racket in laboratories too. They are annoying.
If people want further or higher education then there are colleges. The best solution I think would be the one the did away with, polytechnics.
That way people get a better education, more focused and something that can help them in their chosen career. But it also preserves the status of a degree.
Colleges would be fine except in recent years they have in many cases become little more than a dumping ground for school drop outs and a way to fiddle the unemployment figures.
Yes, I am sure that more people want a degree. It gives them prestige and better job prospects, mainly because not everyone has one. It also puts them in the ever burgeoning intellectual elite. But as VB pointed out, many of them are not.
In short, the only way I can see to preserve the status of university and degrees, plus keeping the job market balanced is to have an elite. There are more unskilled or semi skilled jobs out there than there are highly skilled jobs. But if 50% of the country have a degree, then there will be too many people competing for the same highly skilled jobs.
The best way to fund the universities is just to get some sort of graduate tax after a certain pay level. But before that university should be free.
If by that you mean that they're not getting in because they can't seem to get picked for any of the available places at Uni's, I've got no sympathy. Get some half decent grades and you can get in somewhere without any trouble. If you don't get the grades, then as I said, you shouldn't be going.
If it's something completely different, I take it all back, and I'b be interested to know exactly why they aren't going.
There are still a massive amount of people out there who want to go to uni, but can't.
I didn't make this up, this is from that Laura person who was my 'MP' fopr the day :-S
> "Do you ever leave dog treats in funny places, so that Dave
> Blunkett's guide dog leads him astray by 'accident'?"
*laughs out loud*
All univeristies below the top twenty are pratically swarming with people who really aren't that bright - or have no intention of doing the work.
As things stand, the percentage of students getting a third class degree ranges from something like 8-15%. A third class degree is an absolute joke. A monkey could do better in most cases. Anyone who gets a third class degree is lacking either the intelligence or motivation for further education, and should not be at university.
A 2:2 doesn't represent a particularly great achievement either - just an understanding of most of the fundamental priciples, and the ability to hand in work.
This all depends somewhat on the course and university, obviously (so anyone who I've offended can feel this doesn't apply to them).
Suppose you up the number of students from 43->50%, lets call that a 15% increase. I'd assume at least 2/3 of those didn't go to Uni because they didn't have either the desire or the intelligence to get that far. The other 1/3 we'll assume were victims of circumstance. This woudl mean that you're going to bump up the number of students working at the level which will get a third to 18-25%. That's utterly ridicolous.
It's a huge, huge waste of money on people who really would be better off elsewhere.