Viewing Thread:
"NEW PS3 pics - SPECS much better than 360"

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/614/614619p1.html

oh and its embarrasingly more powerful than the xbox 360

Edgy wrote:
> Aftershock wrote:
> Get over it.
>
> Fetch me a ladder...

Sharp.

Aftershock wrote:
Get over it.

Fetch me a ladder...

Aftershock wrote:
> Emitime wrote:
> May I also say:
>
> "WTF THE PS3 IS HUGE"
>
> Really? Have you checked the size? If you do, based on the width of
> the slot for the media, the PS3 has a width (when laid flat) of just
> 28cm, compared to 30cm for the original PS2. It only looks larger
> because of the convex design.

I only looked at the measurements. And found that they are near identical to the Xbox which is apparantly "huge", so yes.


"WTF IT'S LIKE A HOUSE"

gamesfreak wrote:

> From my limited A level Computing knowledge, I'm sure we learnt
> something along the lines of the PPC architecture having a more
> efficient floating point calculator.

More efficient than what?

Nobody said the original PS2 was slimline, but I will say that it was not HUGE! PS3 is smaller than the original PS2 - the convex nature makes it look larger. Get over it.

*The PS2 was hardly slimline...

*Original release

Emitime wrote:
> May I also say:
>
> "WTF THE PS3 IS HUGE"

Really? Have you checked the size? If you do, based on the width of the slot for the media, the PS3 has a width (when laid flat) of just 28cm, compared to 30cm for the original PS2. It only looks larger because of the convex design.

May I also say:

"WTF THE PS3 IS HUGE"

Notorious Biggles wrote:
> Of course I find that all rather underwhelming, but then I do have a
> degree in it...

I think the 360 runs off a 3 core PPC, no?

From my limited A level Computing knowledge, I'm sure we learnt something along the lines of the PPC architecture having a more efficient floating point calculator.

Untitled wrote:
> all the xbox fanboys

Fanboys?

Untitled wrote:
>its embarrasingly more powerful than the xbox 360

Hypocrite?