The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I've noticed that whenever I mention my own winning when people have asked for help on winning themselves, or when I just mention the fact that I've won once before, I don't win!
On the rare occasions where I haven't even hinted about winning I won a game!
Is mentioning a win at all lowering chances of winning?
On the rare occasions where I haven't even hinted about winning I won a game!
Is mentioning a win at all lowering chances of winning?
Page:
I've noticed that whenever I mention my own winning when people have asked for help on winning themselves, or when I just mention the fact that I've won once before, I don't win!
On the rare occasions where I haven't even hinted about winning I won a game!
Is mentioning a win at all lowering chances of winning?
On the rare occasions where I haven't even hinted about winning I won a game!
Is mentioning a win at all lowering chances of winning?
No comment. :D
I don't think it makes a difference!
but is it possible to win 2 days in a row?
but is it possible to win 2 days in a row?
They judge Gameaday blind now y'know!
By that I mean that they don't look at who posted what.
One of them picks half a dozen or so decent posts, takes out the name, and the other judges which is better.
By that I mean that they don't look at who posted what.
One of them picks half a dozen or so decent posts, takes out the name, and the other judges which is better.
No... the dartboard theory stands high still...
no they select random picker and then they have a weiner!!
I mean winner!
I mean winner!
Look at Pb for an example!
New Jimmy wrote:
> Makes sense, if you boast about winning = you win gameaday
If you
> complain about winning = win gameaday
But seriously, Im sure the
> best article wins, its just nobody likes a boaster!
I don't boast about me winning!
If I mention it at all it's intended to be helpful to others (like when they ask people how they won, etc)
But It wouldn't suprise me if the winner is actually chosen randomly by computer!
It doesn't matter what anyone says, I've seen some pretty crap posts win before!
> Makes sense, if you boast about winning = you win gameaday
If you
> complain about winning = win gameaday
But seriously, Im sure the
> best article wins, its just nobody likes a boaster!
I don't boast about me winning!
If I mention it at all it's intended to be helpful to others (like when they ask people how they won, etc)
But It wouldn't suprise me if the winner is actually chosen randomly by computer!
It doesn't matter what anyone says, I've seen some pretty crap posts win before!
I do agree that some average posts have won in the past.
Page: