Viewing Thread:
"This Big Read thing..."

I watched Ray Mears and his LOTR advocation last night, and it's odd. My favurite book ever, and he had totally different views of it. Still, it should win, even if everybody says 'oh it'll win because it's LOTR' (there is a reason you know......grrrr)

What books do people want to win? (LOTR).... I'm sure there is already a topic on this, but who cares. Oh and one more thing. 1984 is below Goblet Of Fire. How. Is. That. Ever. Possible?

I watched Ray Mears and his LOTR advocation last night, and it's odd. My favurite book ever, and he had totally different views of it. Still, it should win, even if everybody says 'oh it'll win because it's LOTR' (there is a reason you know......grrrr)

What books do people want to win? (LOTR).... I'm sure there is already a topic on this, but who cares. Oh and one more thing. 1984 is below Goblet Of Fire. How. Is. That. Ever. Possible?

The Hitch Hikers Guide To The Galaxy.

Just a brilliant comical book, its also very interlectual.

10/10

Goblet of Fire was a load of childish over-rated toss.

LOTR should win hands down. You know why? Because its bloody brilliant.

Gob of Firey Crapness is a cliched, rubbish, overhyped and overrated pathetic attempt at a novel. Go LOTR.

I'm with Gigz, Hitchhikers Guide for me :D.

Though To Kill a Mocking Bird was excellent also, even If I couldn't write a decent essay on it.

LOTR though? Nah, I just think it's needlessly complicated.

Needlessly complicated? I think you miss the point, Phuzzy my chum.

1984 should be level with LOTR, but LOTR should win. If that made sense.

Gígž wrote:
> its also very interlectual.

You read books?

Hehe.

I saw that too.

Two people got there before me, gurr.
I'm more than slightly worried that I agree with Gigz though.

LOTR is really poorly written.