Viewing Thread:
"CaNdYfLo$$ Leaves"

Well I thought it was about time to stick a little post up about it:

Tomorrow is my last day at SR. Some of you will probably breath a sigh of relief at the fact that I won't be able to ban people anymore; some people might miss the fact that I can ;-)

I'm going to work for a company in London on more money with better prospects. Hopefully I'll find time to check back in and say hello and stuff.

So... you'll have to chase the others at SR to get an anti-spam measure in place.

Hrm, now to think of a usertype I can become after leaving.... ideas?

Yep and DW annoying candy may not be the best thing. He may not have powers but he does have my mobile number and he can always ask for a favour.

DW wrote:
> Candyfloss is gay. Muah!

Candyfloss might not have any powers, but his friends do...

Bob's unstickied the topic.

Bob wrote:
> The one who speaks little on these forums. Not sure what he will use
> as his nick yet but he is still a young padawin and has not yet earn
> the title God.

I'm sorry but I am far beyond the status of God. I get to replace Candy, yes?

Candyfloss is gay. Muah!

The one who speaks little on these forums. Not sure what he will use as his nick yet but he is still a young padawin and has not yet earn the title God.

so whos replacing candy?

No he has no powers any more, I am the only God now. he left me all alone jsut so he could have some more money. It's not like he's broke even. Anyways in case anyone noticed we just had a small glitch for 30 mins. Everythings better now.

TGMbloke wrote:

>
> And are you sure you don't have any powers at all? Surely you must
> know the system inside out now!

Like....colour changing powers for instance. :-D

CaNdYfLo$$ wrote:
> No, I have no powers now :-(
>
> And I therefore couldn't un-sticky this thread even if I wanted to.
> I'm sure Bob will on Monday though. Probably. Maybe.

I will make sure it never dies by *poping* it every few days.

MWAHAHAHA!!!! It shall never die...NEVER!

CaNdYfLo$$ wrote:
> EL ® ö B ì Ñ wrote:
> Why was it sticky in the first place?
>
> Why not? Wouldn't want it slipping down the list would I ;-)

I doubt it would anyways :)