The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Declassified documents show Henry Kissinger giving Isreal the all=clear to violate a ceasefire between Isreal & Russia.
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB98/press.htm
Wow, it's almost like the USA encouraging action to keep the region destabilised.
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB98/press.htm
Wow, it's almost like the USA encouraging action to keep the region destabilised.
Page:
Blank wrote:
> And Belldandy, have you noticed that it only decends into name
> calling when you're here?
Yeah, it's a pain in the a r s e when someone doesn't agree with people isn't it ?
Notice Snuggly showing his age, it's GCSE, gramps. :P
> And Belldandy, have you noticed that it only decends into name
> calling when you're here?
Yeah, it's a pain in the a r s e when someone doesn't agree with people isn't it ?
Notice Snuggly showing his age, it's GCSE, gramps. :P
Snuggly and his delete key. Amusing 24/7.
unknown kernel wrote:
> Belldandy wrote:
> B) Have to get back to you on the employer one, as I'm going to be
> doing a GCE next year.
Haha, I've got twelve of those already!
> Belldandy wrote:
> B) Have to get back to you on the employer one, as I'm going to be
> doing a GCE next year.
Haha, I've got twelve of those already!
Belldandy wrote:
> B) Have to get back to you on the employer one, as I'm going to be
> doing a PGCE next year.
Christ. I'm booking in for a vasectomy.
What happens when one of your pupils proves you wrong? Declare a school holiday for a week?
> B) Have to get back to you on the employer one, as I'm going to be
> doing a PGCE next year.
Christ. I'm booking in for a vasectomy.
What happens when one of your pupils proves you wrong? Declare a school holiday for a week?
Oh dear. Another abuse thread diguised as political debate.
It's almost like Parliament.
Almost.
It's almost like Parliament.
Almost.
Hedfix wrote:
> "One standard solution for everything" reminded me of the
> Tory 'back to basics' plan.
>
> Describing Bell's approach as 'back to basics' was therefore amusing
> to me for obvious reasons. :)
Ah, I thought you meant I was going back to basics and sideline sniping, or something.
And Belldandy, have you noticed that it only decends into name calling when you're here?
> "One standard solution for everything" reminded me of the
> Tory 'back to basics' plan.
>
> Describing Bell's approach as 'back to basics' was therefore amusing
> to me for obvious reasons. :)
Ah, I thought you meant I was going back to basics and sideline sniping, or something.
And Belldandy, have you noticed that it only decends into name calling when you're here?
Or, to put it another way, if anyone wants to discuss topics without attempting various insults then fine, but if you just want to squabble then you can continue your group impersonation of the England Football Team.
Light wrote:
> Heh. It's funny you know; in his own head, the reason he gets such a
> hard time is that we're all wrong and he's the only one sucking from
> the pure teat of truth. I can't WAIT to see him trying that approach
> with his lecturers/employers in the future...
Well, sorry to disappoint, but;
A) After 2 years of a Uni course I've had no problems, the difference being that lecturers actually engage in topics without pretending they aren't biased. Secondly they encourage you to always back arguments with real facts, usually from real journals/texts and not the internet where, lets face it, you can find anything to support anything. I've written numerous essays on topics that have been on this forums, and often adopted viewpoints contrary to the one given in the lecture, but I've scored prety decently on all of them, no paper has been below 2.1 grade, and a fair few have been well within a First grading. When I need to make a convincing, backed up, argument, I can.
B) Have to get back to you on the employer one, as I'm going to be doing a PGCE next year.
Most of you are wrong because you're just as blinkered as I can be sometimes, but you won't admit that. Plus, what's the point of arguing things on here ? It's like a contest to whack ideas into people until everyone gets bored, only to have the topic repeat in a few weeks time. Nothing changes, nothing will that way.
> Heh. It's funny you know; in his own head, the reason he gets such a
> hard time is that we're all wrong and he's the only one sucking from
> the pure teat of truth. I can't WAIT to see him trying that approach
> with his lecturers/employers in the future...
Well, sorry to disappoint, but;
A) After 2 years of a Uni course I've had no problems, the difference being that lecturers actually engage in topics without pretending they aren't biased. Secondly they encourage you to always back arguments with real facts, usually from real journals/texts and not the internet where, lets face it, you can find anything to support anything. I've written numerous essays on topics that have been on this forums, and often adopted viewpoints contrary to the one given in the lecture, but I've scored prety decently on all of them, no paper has been below 2.1 grade, and a fair few have been well within a First grading. When I need to make a convincing, backed up, argument, I can.
B) Have to get back to you on the employer one, as I'm going to be doing a PGCE next year.
Most of you are wrong because you're just as blinkered as I can be sometimes, but you won't admit that. Plus, what's the point of arguing things on here ? It's like a contest to whack ideas into people until everyone gets bored, only to have the topic repeat in a few weeks time. Nothing changes, nothing will that way.
Yes, you sniping sniper you...of course, if you posted stuff agreeing with Bell, he'd be quick to praise you for having seen the light.
Incidentally Hedfix, you managed to make me snort coffee out through my nose when I read that. Cheers!
Incidentally Hedfix, you managed to make me snort coffee out through my nose when I read that. Cheers!
"One standard solution for everything" reminded me of the Tory 'back to basics' plan.
Describing Bell's approach as 'back to basics' was therefore amusing to me for obvious reasons. :)
Describing Bell's approach as 'back to basics' was therefore amusing to me for obvious reasons. :)
Page: