The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
A genuine mistake or something deeper ?
The F.A have yet to comment.
I don't come on much now mate, I only come in Sport to cry about Liverpool and skit the Mancs and Cockneys.
=P
Shame that.
-------------
=D
How are you doin' Bazz? Still talk like a woolyback? =P
(You probably won't even reply to this, so people; excuse me for talking to myself)
> Number of people (outside of Leeds) who cared when Lee Bowyer and
> Woodgate weren't allowed to play for the national team: 12
>
> Sure, they weren't regulars, but i notice a lot more Man U fans using
> the 'innocent until proven guilty' thing now. These are the same
> peopple who chanted 'Woodgates going down'.
Number of people who actually give a toss about Leeds in general: 12
If he gets a 2 year ban then he shouldn't be allowed to play professional football during the dates they set him to be banned for and not before so he therefore should be allowed to play for England.
Sure, they weren't regulars, but i notice a lot more Man U fans using the 'innocent until proven guilty' thing now. These are the same peopple who chanted 'Woodgates going down'.
I'd love it if Rio got a 2 year ban.
Bad for the national team.
good for me to abuse people at school, and also, finally say that we got one over on those scummers.
He has not even been charged yet, which means that the FA saying he is guilty before a charge is laid, let alone a hearing?
Okay, so Rio didn't attend the test. He is technically guilty and the FA should punish him for breaking the rules. We can all agree on that, but this is disgraceful.
Are the FA not even bothered if England lose there vital game against Turkey now?