Viewing Thread:
"Do animals have a religion?"

I was thinking that just seemed kinda natural that not only humans would have some kind of religion, what do you think?

Light wrote:
> Belldandy wrote:
>
>
> So you moan at me, for something you've just done yourself ?
> Ooookay,
> that legitamises your argument.
>
> At least he's self aware enought to admit it.
>
> IMO is is a boring and pointless
> topic and, as of yet, other than a pile of infantile whining,
>
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!
>
>
> no one
> has tried to post any information or points/opinions that disproves
> my opinion or is likely to change it.
>
> Well, then why not...stop posting? If it's boring and pointless,
> don't get involved. Simple, non? (Both you, and the solution).

So you can't actually add anything to the topic then ? Thought not, I'd have expected someone like you to campaign for all animals to have a religion, pension, rights, social security benefits, equal housing rights....

Belldandy wrote:

>
> So you moan at me, for something you've just done yourself ? Ooookay,
> that legitamises your argument.

At least he's self aware enought to admit it.

> IMO is is a boring and pointless
> topic and, as of yet, other than a pile of infantile whining,

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!


no one
> has tried to post any information or points/opinions that disproves
> my opinion or is likely to change it.

Well, then why not...stop posting? If it's boring and pointless, don't get involved. Simple, non? (Both you, and the solution).

Blank wrote:
> Belldandy wrote:
> But Animals and Religion is a boring and pointless topic, there's no
> possible way to prove/disprove it.
>
> Why bother, Belldandy? I mean really, why bother at all? All you've
> done is come into this thread and say "Hey, this topic is stupid
> - and what's more Goatboy is an idiot!" and then run away again.
> You're just using it to throw more at Goatboy, not to discuss what
> was put forward.
>
> I know right now that I'm not either, but I don't intend to continue
> posting in this thread.


So you moan at me, for something you've just done yourself ? Ooookay, that legitamises your argument. IMO is is a boring and pointless topic and, as of yet, other than a pile of infantile whining, no one has tried to post any information or points/opinions that disproves my opinion or is likely to change it.

Belldandy wrote:
> But Animals and Religion is a boring and pointless topic, there's no
> possible way to prove/disprove it.

Why bother, Belldandy? I mean really, why bother at all? All you've done is come into this thread and say "Hey, this topic is stupid - and what's more Goatboy is an idiot!" and then run away again. You're just using it to throw more at Goatboy, not to discuss what was put forward.

I know right now that I'm not either, but I don't intend to continue posting in this thread.

Belldandy wrote:
> But Animals and Religion is a boring and pointless topic, there's no
> possible way to prove/disprove it.

Hey, just cos you lack the imagination to discuss abstract topics, don't get your nappy in a twist when others do.

>
> But, seeing as you feel the need to reply, why not add something to
> the topic Goatboy ? Y'know, instead of parroting Light by just
> replying every time I do ?

Funny; I mention that you parrot opinions, then 'parroting' becomes your new word of the day. God, you even copy your insults off of others...

>
> I stated my opinion, and that isn't going to change.

...unless the US govertment says different, in which case it will. They're not your opinions Bell; an opinion is something that one has thought about. You've just repeated Clancy and Dubya, chapter and verse.

Cowardly cretin.

But Animals and Religion is a boring and pointless topic, there's no possible way to prove/disprove it.

But, seeing as you feel the need to reply, why not add something to the topic Goatboy ? Y'know, instead of parroting Light by just replying every time I do ?

I stated my opinion, and that isn't going to change.

As predictable as you replying to each and every point, stressing how bored you are with replying to each and every point.

Now, how did I know without looking that Light would have quoted me in his reply ? Clairvoyance, or sad predictability ?

Belldandy wrote:
> Alternatively can anyone prove/disprove anything about animals and
> religion ? No, which makes the topic kind of pointless.

Ah, Bell's usual "I'm not interested, ergo it is worthless" approach. What an unimaginative coward you truly are.

>
> Religion, and what it means, is subjective, and that's the whole
> problem, or beauty, of it.

Not to a fundamentalist like you though, right?

Gigs wrote:
> Without any religion would the world have any hope atall?

without mankind the world breath a sigh of relief