The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
And how are they doing that? Well, whilst pursuing 4 suspected terrorists (they'd ran a checkpoint in their car), US troops managed to accidentally kill between 8-11 (depending on which report you read) Iraqi policemen, as well as the 4 suspects.
Hm...yeah, way to go boys! THAT will really encourage the people of Iraq to trust in the occupying coalition. I mean, there may well be more to it; maybe the policemen will turn out to be Saddam loyalists, who knows? But the fact is that the coalition are still behaving in a cack-handed and bullying fashion. That's not a recipe for lasting peace in Iraq, it's a recipe for disaster.
~shakes head~
And people still wonder why the US is so widely hated?
Hm...yeah, way to go boys! THAT will really encourage the people of Iraq to trust in the occupying coalition. I mean, there may well be more to it; maybe the policemen will turn out to be Saddam loyalists, who knows? But the fact is that the coalition are still behaving in a cack-handed and bullying fashion. That's not a recipe for lasting peace in Iraq, it's a recipe for disaster.
~shakes head~
And people still wonder why the US is so widely hated?
Page:
IB i s Guilty
Jesus...this is like watching Richard Blackwood trying to impersonate Bill Hicks.
Embarrassing...but strangely compelling.
Embarrassing...but strangely compelling.
Heh.
Except I have done.
*watches the last remaining shreds of Bell's integrity go down faster than Blair on Bush*
*watches the last remaining shreds of Bell's integrity go down faster than Blair on Bush*
Goatboy wrote:
> 3) Employ the "I know you are but what am I?" defence and
> claim he is baiting, then run away for 2 weeks.
---
Explantion of Bell's hilarious switch in tone of posts.
> 3) Employ the "I know you are but what am I?" defence and
> claim he is baiting, then run away for 2 weeks.
---
Explantion of Bell's hilarious switch in tone of posts.
If it was so *yawn*, you wouldn't bother replying.
But you do, because I own you.
Now dance like a bear for me!
But you do, because I own you.
Now dance like a bear for me!
Goatboy wrote:
> But he has no ability to debate.
> He will post googled opinion and then twist himself into knots trying
> to defend an opinion, even when it becomes blatantly clear he is
> wrong.
>
> Or, if he realises he's in the wrong, he will do one of 3 things:
> 1) Stop posting for 2 weeks, allowing those topics to drift off the
> page
> 2) Blithely ignore that thread and desperately engage in an argument
> in another thread (see Limbaugh thread for an example of this.
> Instead of being a man and acknowledging he was stupid, he takes
> unknown to task over figures gleaned from google searches)
> 3) Employ the "I know you are but what am I?" defence and
> claim he is baiting, then run away for 2 weeks.
>
> Perfect examples of all 3 of these can be seen here and in threads
> below.
> At the end of the day, Belldandy is a mockery of somebody that calls
> themselves intelligent.
> It takes more then a subscription to clancy.com and reading The Daily
> Mail to be considered a worthwhile debater. The ability to concede
> when you may be in the wrong is more important, it shows a
> willingness to listen.
> Instead of spam-quoting, running away like a girl or simply ignoring
> and hoping people will forget.
>
> I was, wait for it...wrong, Rush Limbaugh, Centrifuge Story,
> prostitution etc etc etc.
> All reasons why Bell should be shown to be the mindless right-wing
> butt snorkler that he is.
*yawn*
> But he has no ability to debate.
> He will post googled opinion and then twist himself into knots trying
> to defend an opinion, even when it becomes blatantly clear he is
> wrong.
>
> Or, if he realises he's in the wrong, he will do one of 3 things:
> 1) Stop posting for 2 weeks, allowing those topics to drift off the
> page
> 2) Blithely ignore that thread and desperately engage in an argument
> in another thread (see Limbaugh thread for an example of this.
> Instead of being a man and acknowledging he was stupid, he takes
> unknown to task over figures gleaned from google searches)
> 3) Employ the "I know you are but what am I?" defence and
> claim he is baiting, then run away for 2 weeks.
>
> Perfect examples of all 3 of these can be seen here and in threads
> below.
> At the end of the day, Belldandy is a mockery of somebody that calls
> themselves intelligent.
> It takes more then a subscription to clancy.com and reading The Daily
> Mail to be considered a worthwhile debater. The ability to concede
> when you may be in the wrong is more important, it shows a
> willingness to listen.
> Instead of spam-quoting, running away like a girl or simply ignoring
> and hoping people will forget.
>
> I was, wait for it...wrong, Rush Limbaugh, Centrifuge Story,
> prostitution etc etc etc.
> All reasons why Bell should be shown to be the mindless right-wing
> butt snorkler that he is.
*yawn*
But he has no ability to debate.
He will post googled opinion and then twist himself into knots trying to defend an opinion, even when it becomes blatantly clear he is wrong.
Or, if he realises he's in the wrong, he will do one of 3 things:
1) Stop posting for 2 weeks, allowing those topics to drift off the page
2) Blithely ignore that thread and desperately engage in an argument in another thread (see Limbaugh thread for an example of this. Instead of being a man and acknowledging he was stupid, he takes unknown to task over figures gleaned from google searches)
3) Employ the "I know you are but what am I?" defence and claim he is baiting, then run away for 2 weeks.
Perfect examples of all 3 of these can be seen here and in threads below.
At the end of the day, Belldandy is a mockery of somebody that calls themselves intelligent.
It takes more then a subscription to clancy.com and reading The Daily Mail to be considered a worthwhile debater. The ability to concede when you may be in the wrong is more important, it shows a willingness to listen.
Instead of spam-quoting, running away like a girl or simply ignoring and hoping people will forget.
I was, wait for it...wrong, Rush Limbaugh, Centrifuge Story, prostitution etc etc etc.
All reasons why Bell should be shown to be the mindless right-wing butt snorkler that he is.
He will post googled opinion and then twist himself into knots trying to defend an opinion, even when it becomes blatantly clear he is wrong.
Or, if he realises he's in the wrong, he will do one of 3 things:
1) Stop posting for 2 weeks, allowing those topics to drift off the page
2) Blithely ignore that thread and desperately engage in an argument in another thread (see Limbaugh thread for an example of this. Instead of being a man and acknowledging he was stupid, he takes unknown to task over figures gleaned from google searches)
3) Employ the "I know you are but what am I?" defence and claim he is baiting, then run away for 2 weeks.
Perfect examples of all 3 of these can be seen here and in threads below.
At the end of the day, Belldandy is a mockery of somebody that calls themselves intelligent.
It takes more then a subscription to clancy.com and reading The Daily Mail to be considered a worthwhile debater. The ability to concede when you may be in the wrong is more important, it shows a willingness to listen.
Instead of spam-quoting, running away like a girl or simply ignoring and hoping people will forget.
I was, wait for it...wrong, Rush Limbaugh, Centrifuge Story, prostitution etc etc etc.
All reasons why Bell should be shown to be the mindless right-wing butt snorkler that he is.
For Gods sake Belldandy, just admit you were wrong in the Limbaugh Topic. End of story.
If you are posting simply to "wind Light up" as you put it, you are a Troll, simple as that, and as such should not be taken seriously.
If you are posting simply to "wind Light up" as you put it, you are a Troll, simple as that, and as such should not be taken seriously.
Belldandy wrote:
> I know, but realistically nothing is going to change the stereotype of
> me that certain people hold.
Whilst of course your spamming and refusal to ever admit an error is doing your image the world of good. Coward; can't even acknowledge that you may be in the wrong.
> I know, but realistically nothing is going to change the stereotype of
> me that certain people hold.
Whilst of course your spamming and refusal to ever admit an error is doing your image the world of good. Coward; can't even acknowledge that you may be in the wrong.
Page: