Viewing Thread:
"Caught having secks"

Hee hee my mate was drunk and this bird was drunk, they were nekid on the bed, mate had camera, pictures round school.

yup, my mate got caught at a party having secks with this girl, this strange boy in my class thought it would be funny to take a picture with it using a digital camera then email it to every one. LOL and it is very funny, he is now known as "No balls" as according to the picture he has no balls. :)

Even one of the teacher saw it and said "Thats a funny position to be in"

Mwaah, but you gotta feel sorry for him, but the amount of respect he has at school now, well, if you take away that name almost everyone in the whole school knows him now and thinks he rocks. But then they call him no balls and it is funny again.

Every time he walks into a class room everyone claps, its just great.

:) guess you had to be there to get the full humor out of it.

"i know a lot about computers"

You've said it loads of times, and it obviously isn't true.

Lie #3

EL ® ö B ì Ñ wrote:
> LOL, memo you are a funny guy.

And you're a stupid one. How can you honestly say that I just made up the reason for that post on the spot? I'm 100% serious here. Really.

Just read the thread.

*dies*

Azul wrote:
> You said a close friend/relative of your's died.
>
> You then went on to say it was your goldfish.
> ***
>
> You claimed you didn't copy and paste some text from a site.
> Blank (I think) then went on to prove (with evidence) that you were
> lying, and gave a site with identical wording.
>
> So, you lied twice.
> Happy?

Ok well if you can prove that in that post i said that a relative died then i will admit that i have lied twice, because i dont think i did.

LOL, memo you are a funny guy.

You said a close friend/relative of your's died.

You then went on to say it was your goldfish.
***

You claimed you didn't copy and paste some text from a site.
Blank (I think) then went on to prove (with evidence) that you were lying, and gave a site with identical wording.

So, you lied twice.
Happy?

EL ® ö B ì Ñ wrote:
> Um no you said "THAT" wasn't justified, you cannot justifie
> it after i have said it, anyone can do that.

So now you want me to explain every single post I make in detail as I do it?

I think if you go and read through the posts, it was quite obvious to the more intelligent reader that my reaction was completely justified, and that was the OBVIOUS reason why I typed what I did.

Memorandum! wrote:
> EL ® ö B ì Ñ wrote:
> Memorandum! wrote:
> I'll stop moaning if you stop lying.
>
> There you go again memo, i aint lying, so i have shown at least one
> point that is not true.
>
> Did I say you were lying here? Yes I did. But that comment applies
> to your constant lies too, and I've said it before.

Name 2 lies wich i have done on the whole of my time on SR then of wich you can prove 100%.

Memorandum! wrote:
> That was a sarcastic reaction to someone who tried to insult me.
> There you go, justification.
>
> Next please.

Um no you said "THAT" wasn't justified, you cannot justifie it after i have said it, anyone can do that.
I have shown you one post that you have made that was not entirely true, and i have done so.

EL ® ö B ì Ñ wrote:
> Memorandum! wrote:
> I'll stop moaning if you stop lying.
>
> There you go again memo, i aint lying, so i have shown at least one
> point that is not true.

Did I say you were lying here? Yes I did. But that comment applies to your constant lies too, and I've said it before.

Also, there's no way you can prove you aren't lying without breaking the law, so your point is mute.

ps. you're obviously lying

SECKS