The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
sparked off by lord kugai (, nobish, kumquat, etc.) who says he has an IQ of 131 and use this as a base to every "insult" he gave out. some people take IQ ratings highly and some disregard. i know that my IQ is well above average, but i dont use it to say im smarter than everyone else. i just wanted to know roughly what the intelligence of the forums are...
i have an IQ of 131 (and, no im not related to kugai)
*note:
1)you are at your peak at around about 22-25.
2)90-100 is an average IQ
3)different ages, have different marking systems. (ie. 120 at 24 will be say 10 questions correct, where as for a 60 year old it will be 8 questions right.
i have an IQ of 131 (and, no im not related to kugai)
*note:
1)you are at your peak at around about 22-25.
2)90-100 is an average IQ
3)different ages, have different marking systems. (ie. 120 at 24 will be say 10 questions correct, where as for a 60 year old it will be 8 questions right.
Page:
Clazon wrote:
> no-ones perfect. like my IQ has anything to do with typos and slips
> of the hand. (try that one on the ladies :D)
>
> i have very good english skills, but it doesnt show.
Well if your English skills don't show when you're actually writing English, when the hell will they?
> no-ones perfect. like my IQ has anything to do with typos and slips
> of the hand. (try that one on the ladies :D)
>
> i have very good english skills, but it doesnt show.
Well if your English skills don't show when you're actually writing English, when the hell will they?
Azul wrote:
> Clazon wrote:
> theyre
>
> A rather simple minded typo considering your IQ.
no-ones perfect. like my IQ has anything to do with typos and slips of the hand. (try that one on the ladies :D)
i have very good english skills, but it doesnt show.
> Clazon wrote:
> theyre
>
> A rather simple minded typo considering your IQ.
no-ones perfect. like my IQ has anything to do with typos and slips of the hand. (try that one on the ladies :D)
i have very good english skills, but it doesnt show.
Hahahahah.
:-D
:-D
The hamburger? I can do that one.
Blank wrote:
> Still, if you can make a testical talk you must be doing something >right.
That's nothing. You should see what I can do with them.
> Still, if you can make a testical talk you must be doing something >right.
That's nothing. You should see what I can do with them.
Blank wrote:
> No, a small trained Russian hamster. And I trained it.
you see the hamsters smarter than blank.
> No, a small trained Russian hamster. And I trained it.
you see the hamsters smarter than blank.
I think it was a testical you mistakenly took for a hamster.
Still, if you can make a testical talk you must be doing something right.
Still, if you can make a testical talk you must be doing something right.
English_Bloke wrote:
> Then I believe your IQ is around 180.
>
> I tried to train a hamster to talk, but it came out in a nonsensical
> way, impossible to understand. I think it was Scottish.
*Slap*
> Then I believe your IQ is around 180.
>
> I tried to train a hamster to talk, but it came out in a nonsensical
> way, impossible to understand. I think it was Scottish.
*Slap*
Clazon wrote:
> theyre
A rather simple minded typo considering your IQ.
> theyre
A rather simple minded typo considering your IQ.
Then I believe your IQ is around 180.
I tried to train a hamster to talk, but it came out in a nonsensical way, impossible to understand. I think it was Scottish.
I tried to train a hamster to talk, but it came out in a nonsensical way, impossible to understand. I think it was Scottish.
Page: