The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Spin that you vile little man.
Page:
Belldandy wrote:
> It makes no sense though, it'd be like inviting destruction.
Not really. I mean, think about it. Lot's of people have a go at the US and get away with it. He didn't think they'd do anythin. He thought it was a good idea, the Arab nations would love him, and the West would do nothin'. But it backfired.
> It makes no sense though, it'd be like inviting destruction.
Not really. I mean, think about it. Lot's of people have a go at the US and get away with it. He didn't think they'd do anythin. He thought it was a good idea, the Arab nations would love him, and the West would do nothin'. But it backfired.
But Blair got through the enquiry well.
don't shoot the messenger
he is only doing what he is told from above him. do you really belive that he makes the choices no the PM does.
i do think that he is still doing his job even when he has quit to try to divert attention away from the PM statement in the hutton enquiry
he is only doing what he is told from above him. do you really belive that he makes the choices no the PM does.
i do think that he is still doing his job even when he has quit to try to divert attention away from the PM statement in the hutton enquiry
It makes no sense though, it'd be like inviting destruction.
Yes, but how much of that came from people? Chances are, if this is true, most of the information is from people who were close to Saddam. People that may have been leading the allies on a goose chase. But this is from an American News station, but a trustworthy one. Either way, i think Saddam did have WOMD.
I'd agree with Skarra on most points, except the Saddam feeding false information of WMD possession - not heard of that, and there's just too much supporting evidence that says Iraq did have WMD at one time.
Goatboy wrote:
> In case anyone has forgotten, there were calls for a Judicial Enquiry
> into the reasons for going to war and Blair refused to allow it.
> All of a sudden Dr Kelly dies and "Oh we must have an
> enquiry", and it's being used to distract you from the simple
> and pertinent case:
>
> We were told WOMD existed, Bush told the US that WOMD existed and
> they were a threat, a very real and serious danger to our country.
> No evidence offered except plagarised 12yr old thesis ripped from the
> internet, radium bought from Niger (roundly proved to be false),
> satellite photographs of "sites" that have subsequently
> revealed nothing ("Well we didnt notice them moving all the
> WOMD")
> We have most of the "playing card villains" in custody and
> STILL no WOMD produced as evidence.
> Do not for one single second think The Hutton Enquiry will explain
> anything, and we're being lead away from the fact that the reasons
> offered were lies and have no facts or evidence to support them,
> months after the invasion.
Have you read the latest theory? Well, it's that Saddam used people to tell lies to the allies. I.e, people saying there's WOMD in Iraq, when in fact there were none. Saddam did this to become popular amongst the Arab nations. He didn't for a second think it would backfire as it did.
> I spit on Campbell & Blair for refusing to allow a judicial
> enquiry into the reasons for war.
> This will all be forgotten in a few months and meanwhile a holy war
> is brewing that will last forever and kill many many more people than
> non-existent WOMD.
They wanted to kill us for along time before Iraq. All this war did is take away one of their main funders, i.e. Saddam. And before you say it won't make that much difference to terrorists, just make more Arab's mad at us, what should we have done, nothing? Just left Iraq to fund terrorism???
> I want Blair to blow his brains out on live television screaming
> "I'm sorry for lying and refusing to allow an enquiry" as
> his body slumps to the floor and the families of dead British
> soldiers run in and kick the still twitching corpse.
I'm sure a lot of Iraqi's would want to do that to Saddam, and thank Tony Blair for liberating them from 25 years of hell.
> I am goddamn furious.
> Campbell shouldn't resign, he should personally apologise to the
> families of dead servicemen and Dr Kelly's family and each and every
> person that marched in protest of this illegal, immoral and
> unjustified war.
Illegal, there were 17 sanctions against Iraq, some of which covered Human Rights they was breaching. Even if no WOMD are wound, it was legal on the human rights side.
> In case anyone has forgotten, there were calls for a Judicial Enquiry
> into the reasons for going to war and Blair refused to allow it.
> All of a sudden Dr Kelly dies and "Oh we must have an
> enquiry", and it's being used to distract you from the simple
> and pertinent case:
>
> We were told WOMD existed, Bush told the US that WOMD existed and
> they were a threat, a very real and serious danger to our country.
> No evidence offered except plagarised 12yr old thesis ripped from the
> internet, radium bought from Niger (roundly proved to be false),
> satellite photographs of "sites" that have subsequently
> revealed nothing ("Well we didnt notice them moving all the
> WOMD")
> We have most of the "playing card villains" in custody and
> STILL no WOMD produced as evidence.
> Do not for one single second think The Hutton Enquiry will explain
> anything, and we're being lead away from the fact that the reasons
> offered were lies and have no facts or evidence to support them,
> months after the invasion.
Have you read the latest theory? Well, it's that Saddam used people to tell lies to the allies. I.e, people saying there's WOMD in Iraq, when in fact there were none. Saddam did this to become popular amongst the Arab nations. He didn't for a second think it would backfire as it did.
> I spit on Campbell & Blair for refusing to allow a judicial
> enquiry into the reasons for war.
> This will all be forgotten in a few months and meanwhile a holy war
> is brewing that will last forever and kill many many more people than
> non-existent WOMD.
They wanted to kill us for along time before Iraq. All this war did is take away one of their main funders, i.e. Saddam. And before you say it won't make that much difference to terrorists, just make more Arab's mad at us, what should we have done, nothing? Just left Iraq to fund terrorism???
> I want Blair to blow his brains out on live television screaming
> "I'm sorry for lying and refusing to allow an enquiry" as
> his body slumps to the floor and the families of dead British
> soldiers run in and kick the still twitching corpse.
I'm sure a lot of Iraqi's would want to do that to Saddam, and thank Tony Blair for liberating them from 25 years of hell.
> I am goddamn furious.
> Campbell shouldn't resign, he should personally apologise to the
> families of dead servicemen and Dr Kelly's family and each and every
> person that marched in protest of this illegal, immoral and
> unjustified war.
Illegal, there were 17 sanctions against Iraq, some of which covered Human Rights they was breaching. Even if no WOMD are wound, it was legal on the human rights side.
His replacement is ugly.
Of course you do all realise that the only real effect of his resignation is;
1) a replacement
2) his replacement will make it less obvious what he is doing, hence potentially do even worse
However, I'd bet Mr Campbell knows some pretty sensitive stuff...
1) a replacement
2) his replacement will make it less obvious what he is doing, hence potentially do even worse
However, I'd bet Mr Campbell knows some pretty sensitive stuff...
I was so busy watching the Britney/Madonna video, I didn't even notice! Ho ho! Good riddance, you evil little man.
Page: