Viewing Thread:
"I Don't Get It. I Really Don't Get It. And It's A Shame."

Why is it that someone who's only been here 36 days, posts in the same forum aallll the time, and of which posts are usually nonsensical pieces of, well, crap, gets more votes than people who have built themselves up to be great posters, and an asset to the forums in general?

I'm talking about @ng3l. No disrespect at all to the lass, no no no.

But what I'm saying is, is that it shows that people just really vote for anybody rather than great attributes to this place.

Cookie Monster. He's been here for what, 900 odd days? Posts well all the time. A lot of people like him.
1 vote.
Tilta. 700 odd days. Very good poster indeed. 1 vote.
Rickoss, Unbeliever, MWA, Blank, Totoro, Dark Mark, Aliboy - the list goes on.
Granted, one or two of them don't post as much as they used to.
But the others - they post forum wide.
@ng3l posts the same old limited crap in the Simpleto..., er, General Chat forum.

And it's a shame, because the good posters are sidelined.

Meh, I'm getting too worked up about this for no reason.

I know i dont deserve to be voted for at all, for starters i was banned once and came back, and i am aware i dont contribute alot Im not begging to be voted for either. I actually dont care about a colour change!

I know ive not been here long, dont post alot. What would you prefer that i spam the boards with complete crap like most do. I join in with the odd posts and i read in other forums like the life forum etc and others. But do i have to join in something that does not appeal to me. What you saying that people have to come on 24/7 to be accepted on SR.

When i post anyway i just get crap of other members who prefer to just give me s**t, rather then just leave me alone!

If it means that much to you then i wont vote it does not bother me at all.

I know how you feel. But angel was here a bit longer, until she got banned. But take a look at me. 800+ days old, near 5000 posts. No one even thought of me. It doesn't matter if I posts anything big and clever, some people just hit off with others.

DW wrote:
> I couldn't DISAGREE more about Tiltawhirl. No way, NO WAY, does he
> deserve any votes.

You're missing the point.

Don't you vote for the person who makes a forum wide contribution?
Who posts well?
Who is, erm, a good poster?

damn

I would have voted you if I hadn't been too busy voting for The sagacious one.

(I hope that hadn't posted)

I would have voted you if I hadn't been to busy voting for The sagacious one.

Don't blame me I voted for Snuggly, Trouty and Candy.

Agreed. More people should vote for me. Maybe I should introduce a reward/punishment system. Or a loyalty card, with prizes for voting me multiple times.

In my opinion

I know, I know.