Viewing Thread:
"The running commentary thread."

I've voted. In fact I nearly voted before Snuggers. But thought that might be one of those things that would annoy him. It's a tie between RoJ and saggy.

11 for Grandprix
7 for the sagacious one
4 for Lil Ginge
4 for Black Glove
2 for monkey_man
2 for VenomByte
2 for Kyz
2 for Solksjaer
2 for Memorandum
1 for RoJ
1 for aliboy
1 for Spanky
1 for Cyclone
1 for Dark Mark
1 for gerrod
1 for Lindgren
1 for DW
1 for Totoro
1 for Microchips
1 for Blank
1 for Borat
1 for ssxpro
1 for Monkey With Attitude
1 for @ngel
1 for Unbeliever

Up to Judas

I saw goatboy's vote Sagaxious one topic, and it's not the same thing because he wasn't saying "lets vote in this guy on our forum", and according to most of you lot you pay no attention to Goatboy anyway...

Rosalind wrote:
> I can't find Goatboy's Vote the sagacious one thread. Am I blind, or
> has it been deleted?

Yes, you are blind.

http://ukchatforums.reserve.co.uk/ display_messages.php?threadid=82873&forumid=4007

in reply to goatys link...

*YMCA, you know youve got to stay at the YMCA*

the village people- on "randy" jones' website.

I can't find Goatboy's Vote the sagacious one thread. Am I blind, or has it been deleted?

Belldandy wrote:
> http://ukchatforums.reserve.co.uk/
> display_messages.php?threadid=82905&forumid=52
--

Certainly looks like the usual "Let's vote one of us in"
Ah well, at least I'll personally know exactly how seriously to take Grandprix's victory.

Farcical. I know it's only a forum, but still..

11 for Grandprix
7 for the sagacious one
4 for Lil Ginge
4 for Black Glove
2 for monkey_man
2 for VenomByte
2 for Kyz
2 for Solksjaer
1 for RoJ
1 for aliboy
1 for Spanky
1 for Cyclone
1 for Dark Mark
1 for gerrod
1 for Lindgren
1 for DW
1 for Totoro
1 for Microchips
1 for Blank
1 for Borat
1 for ssxpro
1 for Monkey With Attitude
1 for Memorandum
1 for @ngel
1 for Unbeliever

Up to Memo

Oh look, it's the same post in Sport...

http://ukchatforums.reserve.co.uk/ display_messages.php?threadid=83160&forumid=293

Same as cookie, I think if you have to try and press gang the a forum into voting for one person then it's pointless.

Ineedsleep wrote:
> Oh wait, I've got the idea of voting wrong. I thought the vote was
> for someone that you believed brought something to the forums. I
> didn't realise they had to 'post' everywhere and therefore could only
> be voted for if everyone recognised the name.

*sarcasm meter explodes*

*nods*