The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
> Edgy wrote:
>
> Go Word Count!
>
> What like you just done aswell you mean.
I'll give you three guesses why I did it - and the reason wasn't related to my own word count (I post in short bursts - do I really care about my word count on a web-based forum?)
> Go Word Count!
What like you just done aswell you mean.
> Dark Mark™ wrote:
> lord kugai wrote:
> Hey dark mark,simple minded? i have an iq of 131.
>
> Then you're wasting yourself. If I had an IQ of 131, I certainly
> wouldn't waste my life watching crappy late-night shows which people
> text into to get girls take off their clothes.
>
> Its an ok show which has its moments good and bad, u probably dont
> watch it because ure busy knocking one out in the darkest corner u
> can
> find.
>
> No. I don't watch it because it's crap.
>
> The ladies on the show work hard to the early hours of the morning
> so
>
> little sad acts like u can txt in.
>
> You mean little sad acts like you? Seeing as YOU'RE the one who
> claims it's a good show and YOU'RE the one who claims these girls
> "work hard". How hard is it to sit around for a few hours
> reading out texts (though they probably do have trouble reading
> them)
> and flashing in front of a camera? I thought you said you had a high
> IQ. Cretin.
>
> i bet thats ur problem isnt it? u txted in and they didnt read it
> ahhh,poor baby, go out and get a job and a girlfriend moron,
>
> I have never texted into that show because, a) I don't watch it; and
> b) I have FAR better things to spend my money on and if I want to
> text someone, I'll text a friend, as opposed to some girl who can't
> get a job that doesn't involve flashing her boobs on TV. Oh, and I
> have a job, thanks. It may not pay well and may not be particularly
> taxing, but it's far less degrading than what the "babes"
> are doing. Plus I have had a girlfriend. First one, lasted over a
> year, smartass. So suck on it, kiddo.
>
> socks dont count by the way.
>
> Does your mum?
>
> Check your IQ again, hotshot. Maybe you added a number or two
> somewhere, eh? Nob-end.
>
> Go Dark Mark
Go Word Count!
> lord kugai wrote:
> Hey dark mark,simple minded? i have an iq of 131.
>
> Then you're wasting yourself. If I had an IQ of 131, I certainly
> wouldn't waste my life watching crappy late-night shows which people
> text into to get girls take off their clothes.
>
> Its an ok show which has its moments good and bad, u probably dont
> watch it because ure busy knocking one out in the darkest corner u
> can
> find.
>
> No. I don't watch it because it's crap.
>
> The ladies on the show work hard to the early hours of the morning so
>
> little sad acts like u can txt in.
>
> You mean little sad acts like you? Seeing as YOU'RE the one who
> claims it's a good show and YOU'RE the one who claims these girls
> "work hard". How hard is it to sit around for a few hours
> reading out texts (though they probably do have trouble reading them)
> and flashing in front of a camera? I thought you said you had a high
> IQ. Cretin.
>
> i bet thats ur problem isnt it? u txted in and they didnt read it
> ahhh,poor baby, go out and get a job and a girlfriend moron,
>
> I have never texted into that show because, a) I don't watch it; and
> b) I have FAR better things to spend my money on and if I want to
> text someone, I'll text a friend, as opposed to some girl who can't
> get a job that doesn't involve flashing her boobs on TV. Oh, and I
> have a job, thanks. It may not pay well and may not be particularly
> taxing, but it's far less degrading than what the "babes"
> are doing. Plus I have had a girlfriend. First one, lasted over a
> year, smartass. So suck on it, kiddo.
>
> socks dont count by the way.
>
> Does your mum?
>
> Check your IQ again, hotshot. Maybe you added a number or two
> somewhere, eh? Nob-end.
Go Dark Mark
> Hey dark mark,simple minded? i have an iq of 131.
Then you're wasting yourself. If I had an IQ of 131, I certainly wouldn't waste my life watching crappy late-night shows which people text into to get girls take off their clothes.
> Its an ok show which has its moments good and bad, u probably dont
> watch it because ure busy knocking one out in the darkest corner u can
> find.
No. I don't watch it because it's crap.
> The ladies on the show work hard to the early hours of the morning so
> little sad acts like u can txt in.
You mean little sad acts like you? Seeing as YOU'RE the one who claims it's a good show and YOU'RE the one who claims these girls "work hard". How hard is it to sit around for a few hours reading out texts (though they probably do have trouble reading them) and flashing in front of a camera? I thought you said you had a high IQ. Cretin.
> i bet thats ur problem isnt it? u txted in and they didnt read it
> ahhh,poor baby, go out and get a job and a girlfriend moron,
I have never texted into that show because, a) I don't watch it; and b) I have FAR better things to spend my money on and if I want to text someone, I'll text a friend, as opposed to some girl who can't get a job that doesn't involve flashing her boobs on TV. Oh, and I have a job, thanks. It may not pay well and may not be particularly taxing, but it's far less degrading than what the "babes" are doing. Plus I have had a girlfriend. First one, lasted over a year, smartass. So suck on it, kiddo.
> socks dont count by the way.
Does your mum?
Check your IQ again, hotshot. Maybe you added a number or two somewhere, eh? Nob-end.
> Hey dark mark,simple minded?i have an iq of 131.Its an ok show which
> has its moments good and bad,u probably dont watch it because ure
> busy knocking one out in the darkest corner u can find.
But you watch a show where ladies display themselves in erotic ways
The ladies on
> the show work hard to the early hours of the morning so little sad
> acts like u can txt in.
They choose to do the job.
That is all.