The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Just watching this on the news, he's being charged with abduction and a sexual offence. What sexual offence?
What made me laugh was how they said
"A court order prevents the girl from being identified".
Yeah, well done brainiacs, the name Shevaun Pennington WASN'T plastered all over the news, tabloids and discussion programmes for several weeks was it? idiots.
What made me laugh was how they said
"A court order prevents the girl from being identified".
Yeah, well done brainiacs, the name Shevaun Pennington WASN'T plastered all over the news, tabloids and discussion programmes for several weeks was it? idiots.
Page:
Blank wrote:
> If you let your child spend an unlimited amount of time with
> unrestricted internet access without knowing what kind of things are
> viewable, you need to be punished. Any good parent finds that kind of
> stuff out for themselves beforehand.
Any parent with a brain knows allowing their child to spend 11 hours a day on the net (or however long it was she supposedly spent on it) without supervision is not healthy or safe.
> If you let your child spend an unlimited amount of time with
> unrestricted internet access without knowing what kind of things are
> viewable, you need to be punished. Any good parent finds that kind of
> stuff out for themselves beforehand.
Any parent with a brain knows allowing their child to spend 11 hours a day on the net (or however long it was she supposedly spent on it) without supervision is not healthy or safe.
If you let your child spend an unlimited amount of time with unrestricted internet access without knowing what kind of things are viewable, you need to be punished. Any good parent finds that kind of stuff out for themselves beforehand.
How could they not know she spent so much time online ?
"Worst Parents Ever" *Simpsons comic shop guy voice*
"Worst Parents Ever" *Simpsons comic shop guy voice*
Blank wrote:
> Her parents should be punished just as much as he is. Bloody idiots.
Just because they're country bumpkins doesn't mean that they have that many less rights than us proper humans. His Dad's near blind anyway, so a 30 year old marine could have looked like a young boy for all he knew.
> Her parents should be punished just as much as he is. Bloody idiots.
Just because they're country bumpkins doesn't mean that they have that many less rights than us proper humans. His Dad's near blind anyway, so a 30 year old marine could have looked like a young boy for all he knew.
Her parents should be punished just as much as he is. Bloody idiots.
Strange laws of this country, 12 year olds can steal, rob, assault, joyride, rape etc and be held accountable for it, yet they cannot make the decision to associate with someone, even when in this case they have knowingly forged an identity to create that association.
The kid is f^*ked in the head, she obviously needs help.
The kid is f^*ked in the head, she obviously needs help.
Kiriyama wrote:
> cookie monster wrote:
> AfroJoe wrote:
> Abduction? I thought she chose to go with him.
>
> Yeah, but she wasnt old enough to make that decision for herself.
>
> I have a 12-year-old sister who would be fully capable to make that
> sort of decision.
*Slaps head*
It's not about the girl being deemed to be crazy or anything - a twelve year old girl, by law, cannot make the decision. She's still under her parent's/guardian's rule.
> cookie monster wrote:
> AfroJoe wrote:
> Abduction? I thought she chose to go with him.
>
> Yeah, but she wasnt old enough to make that decision for herself.
>
> I have a 12-year-old sister who would be fully capable to make that
> sort of decision.
*Slaps head*
It's not about the girl being deemed to be crazy or anything - a twelve year old girl, by law, cannot make the decision. She's still under her parent's/guardian's rule.
Kiriyama wrote:
> cookie monster wrote:
> AfroJoe wrote:
> Abduction? I thought she chose to go with him.
>
> Yeah, but she wasnt old enough to make that decision for herself.
>
> I have a 12-year-old sister who would be fully capable to make that
> sort of decision.
Yes, but not in the eyes of the law.
> cookie monster wrote:
> AfroJoe wrote:
> Abduction? I thought she chose to go with him.
>
> Yeah, but she wasnt old enough to make that decision for herself.
>
> I have a 12-year-old sister who would be fully capable to make that
> sort of decision.
Yes, but not in the eyes of the law.
cookie monster wrote:
> AfroJoe wrote:
> Abduction? I thought she chose to go with him.
>
> Yeah, but she wasnt old enough to make that decision for herself.
I have a 12-year-old sister who would be fully capable to make that sort of decision.
> AfroJoe wrote:
> Abduction? I thought she chose to go with him.
>
> Yeah, but she wasnt old enough to make that decision for herself.
I have a 12-year-old sister who would be fully capable to make that sort of decision.
Ben is some sort of mecha-genius, but I have a picture of him that would just shatter your illusion of anyone...unless they were someone who got absolutely sloshed and leaned with their face against a public lav.
Page: