The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Just wondering:
1)What does 3:16 mean?
2)Where is X-Pac?
Does anybody know?
1)What does 3:16 mean?
2)Where is X-Pac?
Does anybody know?
Page:
DW wrote:
> I'm sure it does. You're probably some 11 year old who sits behind
> his monitor reading TheMayhem or 411, sees a story and believes it's
> true. Yes?
Actually it was stated by Jeremy Borash at an NWA:TNA press conference and relayed to almost every wrestling publication on both sides of the pacific. The words "no plans to use him again" were used.
As for my credentials I have been a wrestling fan for over fifteen years starting when my grandfather took me to watch an old school British Wrestling promotion when I was six (you know one of those deals where big fat guys put each other in head locks for ten minutes at a time). So you work out my age hot shot.
As for X-Pac, I actually agree with you DW. He was undoubtedly the best worker by far in DX. His fued with Shane McMahon over the now defunct European title was superb, as was his dramatic return to the WWF to start D-generation-x mk2 to begin with. During that segment he cut one of the best promo's it has ever been my good fortune to listen to.
My problems with X-Pac are with his actions over the last two years or so. He meddled with the booking backstage, refused to lie down for Booker T during the N.W.O fued (something which is in any scenerio unforgiveable), and putting in such lazy performances in the ring that I physically hurled my remote a the t.v. or more than one occasion.
Allegedly he turned up to work more than once in a state described as "unfit to perform", which if you know your wrestling cliches means he more than likely has a substance problem. And, most importantly, he gained genuine heat from fans. Not the "I'm going to boo you because your good at being a heel" heat. It was more like "we're going to boo you because we really don't want you to be in that ring" kind of heat. Which was probably the reason the WWE let him go.
In my view (and I must state this is only my opinion so in the grand scheme of things it probably doesn't mean a whole hell of a lot) X-Pac IS a moron because he had it all, the career, the girl, the stroke, the talent, and he seems intent on throwing it all away. And anybody who does that I can whole heartedly respect.
But then hell, it's just an opinion.
> I'm sure it does. You're probably some 11 year old who sits behind
> his monitor reading TheMayhem or 411, sees a story and believes it's
> true. Yes?
Actually it was stated by Jeremy Borash at an NWA:TNA press conference and relayed to almost every wrestling publication on both sides of the pacific. The words "no plans to use him again" were used.
As for my credentials I have been a wrestling fan for over fifteen years starting when my grandfather took me to watch an old school British Wrestling promotion when I was six (you know one of those deals where big fat guys put each other in head locks for ten minutes at a time). So you work out my age hot shot.
As for X-Pac, I actually agree with you DW. He was undoubtedly the best worker by far in DX. His fued with Shane McMahon over the now defunct European title was superb, as was his dramatic return to the WWF to start D-generation-x mk2 to begin with. During that segment he cut one of the best promo's it has ever been my good fortune to listen to.
My problems with X-Pac are with his actions over the last two years or so. He meddled with the booking backstage, refused to lie down for Booker T during the N.W.O fued (something which is in any scenerio unforgiveable), and putting in such lazy performances in the ring that I physically hurled my remote a the t.v. or more than one occasion.
Allegedly he turned up to work more than once in a state described as "unfit to perform", which if you know your wrestling cliches means he more than likely has a substance problem. And, most importantly, he gained genuine heat from fans. Not the "I'm going to boo you because your good at being a heel" heat. It was more like "we're going to boo you because we really don't want you to be in that ring" kind of heat. Which was probably the reason the WWE let him go.
In my view (and I must state this is only my opinion so in the grand scheme of things it probably doesn't mean a whole hell of a lot) X-Pac IS a moron because he had it all, the career, the girl, the stroke, the talent, and he seems intent on throwing it all away. And anybody who does that I can whole heartedly respect.
But then hell, it's just an opinion.
Buah, now my post doesn't make sense because YOU posted again before me.
Gillberg.
Gillberg.
Yes.. :$
:)
:)
Incase you didn't know, X-Pac was my favourite WWE wrestler until he was fired/left/whatever.
Halfcut Skeleton wrote:
> Dudes X-pac's a moron. You know he was supposed to return to NWA:TNA
> on May 21st as a main eventer, but instead missed his flight form
> L.A. to Nashville, and got told his services where not required.
X-Pac is a moron? Hah. Give me a break. That is a load of crap unless it was officially stated on his website. And there's always two sides to a story.
> Efectively he got fired from an orginisation he could've made a
> killing in before he even started.
He never got 'fired'.
> That cheers me up whenever I'm feeling down.
I'm sure it does. You're probably some 11 year old who sits behind his monitor reading TheMayhem or 411, sees a story and believes it's true. Yes?
> Dudes X-pac's a moron. You know he was supposed to return to NWA:TNA
> on May 21st as a main eventer, but instead missed his flight form
> L.A. to Nashville, and got told his services where not required.
X-Pac is a moron? Hah. Give me a break. That is a load of crap unless it was officially stated on his website. And there's always two sides to a story.
> Efectively he got fired from an orginisation he could've made a
> killing in before he even started.
He never got 'fired'.
> That cheers me up whenever I'm feeling down.
I'm sure it does. You're probably some 11 year old who sits behind his monitor reading TheMayhem or 411, sees a story and believes it's true. Yes?
Lipe wrote:
> I was discussing this with GP on MSN and China is pretty stupid. I
> mean she's massive, X-Pac could never "beat" her, she
> easily knows how to defend herself.
Oh please. Even the toughest women can't defend themselves all the time. And anyway, where's the proof Sean attacker her?
> I was discussing this with GP on MSN and China is pretty stupid. I
> mean she's massive, X-Pac could never "beat" her, she
> easily knows how to defend herself.
Oh please. Even the toughest women can't defend themselves all the time. And anyway, where's the proof Sean attacker her?
Lipe wrote:
> X-Pac ruined DX! Damn him to hell!
He ruined DX? HE RUINED DX? Nobody ruined DX; they were without a doubt the best faction going. And when they reunited, X-Pac was the best damn wrestler in DX.
> X-Pac ruined DX! Damn him to hell!
He ruined DX? HE RUINED DX? Nobody ruined DX; they were without a doubt the best faction going. And when they reunited, X-Pac was the best damn wrestler in DX.
ENOUGH!
I've sat back and listened to you all whining for long enough.
Now I shall defend X-Pac.
I've sat back and listened to you all whining for long enough.
Now I shall defend X-Pac.
Update on the restraining order ish. SeanWaltman.com posted a bulletin stating that the restraining order against Sean Waltman has been dropped. Apparently Waltman arrived in court to find out that Joanie Laurer had no showed. With nobody to present her side of the case the court decided to drop the order against Waltman.
Strikes me as kinda curious that.
Strikes me as kinda curious that.
Very_Metal wrote:
> X-Pac (shaun waltman) is married to Chyna and is currently in trouble
> for beating her apparantly :)
---
Shouldn't it be the other way around...
> X-Pac (shaun waltman) is married to Chyna and is currently in trouble
> for beating her apparantly :)
---
Shouldn't it be the other way around...
Page: