The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I was shocked to hear that in Isreal, they have pioneered a scheme where the eggs of aborted female foetuses could be extracted and used for IVF for a woman who is infertile. The eggs are extracted from the dead foestus' ovaries, fertilised with the 'father's' sperm and implanted in the womb of the woman who wants a baby. Shocking.
This means that the baby's biological mother was not only not the woman who carried it and will raise it, but was never born in the first place. So, in the eyes of the law, the baby's mother never existed! Also, the father of the baby has had the equivilant of sex with an unborn baby (quite disgusting, actually.)
What do you think about this? What do you think about IVF generally?
This means that the baby's biological mother was not only not the woman who carried it and will raise it, but was never born in the first place. So, in the eyes of the law, the baby's mother never existed! Also, the father of the baby has had the equivilant of sex with an unborn baby (quite disgusting, actually.)
What do you think about this? What do you think about IVF generally?
Page:
Goatboy wrote:
> I think it offers the chance of kids to people that otherwise may
> never have them.
> The End.
But it's not really the end though is it? This is involving taking the eggs form an unconsenting (obviously) female who hasn't even been born! This is a terrible abuse of technology.
I agree that normal IVF is good in a way, but it has triggered off all sorts of undesirable options such as the above and 'designer babies.'
> I think it offers the chance of kids to people that otherwise may
> never have them.
> The End.
But it's not really the end though is it? This is involving taking the eggs form an unconsenting (obviously) female who hasn't even been born! This is a terrible abuse of technology.
I agree that normal IVF is good in a way, but it has triggered off all sorts of undesirable options such as the above and 'designer babies.'
I think that if science can be used to give people who want children but couldn't have them otherwise then there is no problem and it should be done.
IVF is alright on its own. But I think that Israeli thing is a step too far.
I find it abhorent and disrespectful to allow ANYONE to have kids by any means whatsoever; natural pumping, un-natural pumping, piping and pippeting.
Kids-don't have them.
Kids-don't have them.
I think it offers the chance of kids to people that otherwise may never have them.
The End.
The End.
I was shocked to hear that in Isreal, they have pioneered a scheme where the eggs of aborted female foetuses could be extracted and used for IVF for a woman who is infertile. The eggs are extracted from the dead foestus' ovaries, fertilised with the 'father's' sperm and implanted in the womb of the woman who wants a baby. Shocking.
This means that the baby's biological mother was not only not the woman who carried it and will raise it, but was never born in the first place. So, in the eyes of the law, the baby's mother never existed! Also, the father of the baby has had the equivilant of sex with an unborn baby (quite disgusting, actually.)
What do you think about this? What do you think about IVF generally?
This means that the baby's biological mother was not only not the woman who carried it and will raise it, but was never born in the first place. So, in the eyes of the law, the baby's mother never existed! Also, the father of the baby has had the equivilant of sex with an unborn baby (quite disgusting, actually.)
What do you think about this? What do you think about IVF generally?
Page: