The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I've been reading a lot of anti-brand split sentiments, and whilst I share the negative opinions to an extent, I actually like the idea of a roster split.
Firstly, a lot of other people are getting a chance to shine - who here honestly believes Christian would get a IC reign if the rosters weren't split? Who thinks Brock wouldn't have been pinned? Ultimately, I don't think that WWE will get a WWF/WCW competition going on, but there is more variety and people to see, and that is a good thing IMO.
Don't get me wrong - Bad Blood was a let down for me, and people who read my post a week ago know I was looking forward to it. But even though there were man things wrong that doesn't mean its the way its always going to be - this is the first one! Sure, if I was paying it may be different, but I'm not.
Compare the first Raw to nowadays - sure, there are some things that will never change, but one thing I always feel from a lot of wrestling sites, and this forum quite frequently, is negativity. Instead of looking the negatives all the time, be optimistic - there's certainly something you like, otherwise you wouldn't still be watching.
If we all had a shot at something, then someone shot us down immediately at the stuff we'd done wrong, then we'd think it was unfair. The roster split may indeed not work, but the least we can do is give them a chance to improve.
Firstly, a lot of other people are getting a chance to shine - who here honestly believes Christian would get a IC reign if the rosters weren't split? Who thinks Brock wouldn't have been pinned? Ultimately, I don't think that WWE will get a WWF/WCW competition going on, but there is more variety and people to see, and that is a good thing IMO.
Don't get me wrong - Bad Blood was a let down for me, and people who read my post a week ago know I was looking forward to it. But even though there were man things wrong that doesn't mean its the way its always going to be - this is the first one! Sure, if I was paying it may be different, but I'm not.
Compare the first Raw to nowadays - sure, there are some things that will never change, but one thing I always feel from a lot of wrestling sites, and this forum quite frequently, is negativity. Instead of looking the negatives all the time, be optimistic - there's certainly something you like, otherwise you wouldn't still be watching.
If we all had a shot at something, then someone shot us down immediately at the stuff we'd done wrong, then we'd think it was unfair. The roster split may indeed not work, but the least we can do is give them a chance to improve.
Page:
Jericho17 wrote:
> Run to the Hurricycle.
YeY!
> Run to the Hurricycle.
YeY!
Hurricane is my favourite wrestler...
Run to the Hurricycle.
Scary Hurrifans...
*slowly walks out the room*
*slowly walks out the room*
Yes. I agree.
I wrote a load of crap.
WHASSUPWITDAT!?!?
I wrote a load of crap.
WHASSUPWITDAT!?!?
Do me a favour, takes a lot of balls to admit you don't like the Hurricane, what the hell?
WASSUPWIDAT?!
:D
WASSUPWIDAT?!
:D
Lipe wrote:
> IMO Hurricane jst ain't that good.
It's about time you learn that your 'opinion' is wrong.
;c) ;c)
Nah, fair play to ya for admitting that you hate Hurricane, that takes a lot of balls. Now he's gunna come round your house and Hurrislam your ass down.
> IMO Hurricane jst ain't that good.
It's about time you learn that your 'opinion' is wrong.
;c) ;c)
Nah, fair play to ya for admitting that you hate Hurricane, that takes a lot of balls. Now he's gunna come round your house and Hurrislam your ass down.
*Cough* RVD *Cough*
I think I could accept the roster split more if they concentrated on putting on better matches instead of 1-3 minute squashes that we get nowadays, and of course, the supressing of real talent.
Yeah, he's got some good catchphrases and stuff but there's just something about him that I don't like...
Page: