The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,967548,00.html
Belldandy?
Belldandy?
Page:
Oopsy daisy... http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/05/30/ wolfowitz.vanity.fair/index.html
Rather esay to create a story with selective editing eh? Maybe the Guardian should check what the story is based on before running with it, I only knew about this a few hours ago, but I haven't printed a story about it...
Rather esay to create a story with selective editing eh? Maybe the Guardian should check what the story is based on before running with it, I only knew about this a few hours ago, but I haven't printed a story about it...
Belldandy wrote:
> Even if there is no WMD, the whole fuss over it has been kickstarted
> by the Anti-war lobby who, in the face of the bl£eding obvious -
> that liberating the Iraqi people could only be done by force - are now
> desperate for a new route to criticise the whole campaign because they
> look rather stupid criticising the invasion now so many Iraqi's are
> glad Saddam was gone. Ever since the statues toppled they've looked
> for something, and now they have it.
The whole fuss about WMD kickstarted by the anti-war lobby? The reason we went to war in the first place was because Iraq posed a real terrorist threat to the US and UK, with chemical and biological weapons. A few days into the war and it was "Our main objective is to free the Iraqi citizens". Now it's revealed that they even knew it was bullshite all along.
They needed to relate the war to us so that we would support it - once they'd done that they dropped it. But what makes me wonder is that if the real objective was to free the Iraqis, why the hell was it done? You really think Bush gives a crap about those people? I'm sure it's just a massive coincidence that the five companies with the biggest contracts in Iraq were also the five main companies that funded Bush's presedential campaign...
> Even if there is no WMD, the whole fuss over it has been kickstarted
> by the Anti-war lobby who, in the face of the bl£eding obvious -
> that liberating the Iraqi people could only be done by force - are now
> desperate for a new route to criticise the whole campaign because they
> look rather stupid criticising the invasion now so many Iraqi's are
> glad Saddam was gone. Ever since the statues toppled they've looked
> for something, and now they have it.
The whole fuss about WMD kickstarted by the anti-war lobby? The reason we went to war in the first place was because Iraq posed a real terrorist threat to the US and UK, with chemical and biological weapons. A few days into the war and it was "Our main objective is to free the Iraqi citizens". Now it's revealed that they even knew it was bullshite all along.
They needed to relate the war to us so that we would support it - once they'd done that they dropped it. But what makes me wonder is that if the real objective was to free the Iraqis, why the hell was it done? You really think Bush gives a crap about those people? I'm sure it's just a massive coincidence that the five companies with the biggest contracts in Iraq were also the five main companies that funded Bush's presedential campaign...
Yes ?
So what ? End of the day we blew into Iraq and kicked out a madman and his guys along with him.
Even if there is no WMD, the whole fuss over it has been kickstarted by the Anti-war lobby who, in the face of the bl£eding obvious - that liberating the Iraqi people could only be done by force - are now desperate for a new route to criticise the whole campaign because they look rather stupid criticising the invasion now so many Iraqi's are glad Saddam was gone. Ever since the statues toppled they've looked for something, and now they have it.
And you know what ? Not many care. They couldn't stop a war with their criticism and campaigning, and they won't stop the rebuilding of Iraq either.
Kudos to Stop The War Coalition whose "End the occupation" slogan is about as well thought out as the average post on here - I'm sure the ideal thing to do would be for everyone to withdraw from Iraq now and let a repeat of 1991 happen....'cause that's what the ever desperate Stop The War wants now...
So what ? End of the day we blew into Iraq and kicked out a madman and his guys along with him.
Even if there is no WMD, the whole fuss over it has been kickstarted by the Anti-war lobby who, in the face of the bl£eding obvious - that liberating the Iraqi people could only be done by force - are now desperate for a new route to criticise the whole campaign because they look rather stupid criticising the invasion now so many Iraqi's are glad Saddam was gone. Ever since the statues toppled they've looked for something, and now they have it.
And you know what ? Not many care. They couldn't stop a war with their criticism and campaigning, and they won't stop the rebuilding of Iraq either.
Kudos to Stop The War Coalition whose "End the occupation" slogan is about as well thought out as the average post on here - I'm sure the ideal thing to do would be for everyone to withdraw from Iraq now and let a repeat of 1991 happen....'cause that's what the ever desperate Stop The War wants now...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,967548,00.html
Belldandy?
Belldandy?
Page: