The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Here's the idea. we create a fictional conversation between two people, (alternating between the two people. ie depending on which fictional person replied last you have to reply as the other). YOU CAN ONLY SPEAK IN MOVIE QUOTES AND YOU MUST PUT THE MOVIE THE QUOTE IS FROM. The next quote cannot be from the same movie.
So for instance the first message could be:
PERSON 1: "Here's Johnny!" (the shining)
and the second message
PERSON 2: "Oh hello Johnny Five" (Short circuit 2)
and so on.
Sound fun?
Oh and MOVIE quotes only.
So for instance the first message could be:
PERSON 1: "Here's Johnny!" (the shining)
and the second message
PERSON 2: "Oh hello Johnny Five" (Short circuit 2)
and so on.
Sound fun?
Oh and MOVIE quotes only.
Page:
Febble indeed.
Now I actually read the post, I duely understand.
Peace out, dawg.
Now I actually read the post, I duely understand.
Peace out, dawg.
once again febble
FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> "Hallo. My name is Inigo Montoya, you killed my father. Prepare
> to die"
>
> Isn't only having 2 people a bit exclusive on an open forum with over
> 2000 users? And, also, it's just a pretty crappy idea.
Read it again: two FICTIONAL people. you see the conversation was supposed to make somesort of sense therefore it was easier if it was presented as a conversation between 2 people. Anyone could write in you fool. I'll admit its a little bit complicated (like writing febble, febble, febble) but i thought people could handle it.
Anyway I shall be resurrecting this at a later date. and I'll try to make the overall idea a little easier to understand (if only for your sake triple f). And its requires a little more thought and knowledge than 'word association'.
> "Hallo. My name is Inigo Montoya, you killed my father. Prepare
> to die"
>
> Isn't only having 2 people a bit exclusive on an open forum with over
> 2000 users? And, also, it's just a pretty crappy idea.
Read it again: two FICTIONAL people. you see the conversation was supposed to make somesort of sense therefore it was easier if it was presented as a conversation between 2 people. Anyone could write in you fool. I'll admit its a little bit complicated (like writing febble, febble, febble) but i thought people could handle it.
Anyway I shall be resurrecting this at a later date. and I'll try to make the overall idea a little easier to understand (if only for your sake triple f). And its requires a little more thought and knowledge than 'word association'.
febble
"Lets all be HAPPY" - Barney the movie
"Hallo. My name is Inigo Montoya, you killed my father. Prepare to die"
Isn't only having 2 people a bit exclusive on an open forum with over 2000 users? And, also, it's just a pretty crappy idea.
Isn't only having 2 people a bit exclusive on an open forum with over 2000 users? And, also, it's just a pretty crappy idea.
Hedfix wrote:
> Anyone who isn't a febble excuse for a human being.
Heh heh.
> Anyone who isn't a febble excuse for a human being.
Heh heh.
ok
"first you wanna kill me, now you wanna kiss me - blow"
army of darkness
"first you wanna kill me, now you wanna kiss me - blow"
army of darkness
Cheers memorandum, go s**t on someone elses good idea for a game.
Anyone who isn't a febble excuse for a human being be my guest to try and resurrect this game.
Anyone who isn't a febble excuse for a human being be my guest to try and resurrect this game.
I knew that when I added person 3.
I just wanted to mess up your stupid pointless little game.
I just wanted to mess up your stupid pointless little game.
Page: