The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I also thought that Tekken 3 and F1 2000 had great graphics.
I hadn't played Tekken 2 for a while-I'd been to engrossed in Tekken Tag Tournament.
Today, I played Tekken 2. The graphics were....rubbish compared to the graphics on TTT.
Of course, this is to be expected. But, it's surprising. You've always thought a game had great graphics, until you see the next version on a different console.
It's the same with F1 2000. I compare them to F1 World Championship Season 2000 on PS2, and....you can't compare them really!!
I played Driver 2 for the first time today. I was so surprised when I saw the graphics. I thought they were extremely poor!!
Of course, the graphics are great for a PSX game, but when you've played a PS2, you really notice the difference.
Also, you begin to notice all the pixels and polygons more!!
I'd never really noticed them before, but all of a sudden, they're as clear as daylight!!
Has anyone else experienced this??
What this shows, is that there is a big difference in the capabilty of the consoles.
The people who said that the PS2 is no better than the PSX have no idea what they're talking about!!
Thanks for reading, Ant.
PS- Just thought I'd tell ya, my mate today called the PSOne a P-Sone!! LOL!!
>It's not just the graphics that improve.
Unfortunately with some sequels or follow-ups, it is only the graphics that improve!
It's not just the graphics that improve.
i have to agree the 64 was pushed to the max with perfect dark. playing the mulitplayer with 3 mates and 4 cpu simulants rules. something that could never be produced on the psx. the only reason they can get good graphics with games like mgs is because they have no multiplayer. if multiplayer was removed from PD then the graphics would be even more breathtaking
IT allows you to have 8 bots in the game and they have cooperation and counter op, that works fine.