The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Watched this at the week-end
Thought it was pretty damn good actually, with maybe some bits hurried over too much or not really explained.
Still I liked it, especially that gun with the sonic boom, nice.
And those future motorway car things
Thought it was pretty damn good actually, with maybe some bits hurried over too much or not really explained.
Still I liked it, especially that gun with the sonic boom, nice.
And those future motorway car things
Page:
I invented the sick-stick.
Not true.
I wish it was though.
Not true.
I wish it was though.
i also thought it was good even though I saw it last year.Nice Unexpected ending
MoJoJoJo wrote:
> At least it didn't have Tom Hanks in it.
--
But it did have Colin Farrell. Every single film will eventually have one of those two in it.
> At least it didn't have Tom Hanks in it.
--
But it did have Colin Farrell. Every single film will eventually have one of those two in it.
Yeah, I quite liked it. I was really suspicious, but my movie-lovin' mate said it was better than he expected, so I gave it a rent. Enjoyed it quite a bit.
At least it didn't have Tom Hanks in it.
At least it didn't have Tom Hanks in it.
Colin Farrell got shot. This amused me.
SHEEPY wrote:
> What I felt it didn't explain was how being the child of a drug user
> gave you a special gift of seeing the future
She was supposed to have done loads of genetic experiments - it was the experiments that created the kids just like it created the plants.
> That the only reason Tom Cruise was going to kill that guy is because
> he saw his own future... strange paradox thing.
He wasn't going to kill him for that, he wanted to know WHY he was going to kill him then when he went to his flat to find out why, he found pictures of his missing kid. It should have ended after that scene...
> What I felt it didn't explain was how being the child of a drug user
> gave you a special gift of seeing the future
She was supposed to have done loads of genetic experiments - it was the experiments that created the kids just like it created the plants.
> That the only reason Tom Cruise was going to kill that guy is because
> he saw his own future... strange paradox thing.
He wasn't going to kill him for that, he wanted to know WHY he was going to kill him then when he went to his flat to find out why, he found pictures of his missing kid. It should have ended after that scene...
"You're going to kill this person"
"Okay then, I'll go on a rage-fuelled adventure to find out why"
"Don't kill anyone though"
"I won't, although on an entirely unrelated issue, my son was kidnapped"
"Okay then, I'll go on a rage-fuelled adventure to find out why"
"Don't kill anyone though"
"I won't, although on an entirely unrelated issue, my son was kidnapped"
Very '1984' influenced I guessed
Eye scans, Spyders and the idea that you're arrested for something you haven't actually done.
What I felt it didn't explain was how being the child of a drug user gave you a special gift of seeing the future
AND
That the only reason Tom Cruise was going to kill that guy is because he saw his own future... strange paradox thing.
Eye scans, Spyders and the idea that you're arrested for something you haven't actually done.
What I felt it didn't explain was how being the child of a drug user gave you a special gift of seeing the future
AND
That the only reason Tom Cruise was going to kill that guy is because he saw his own future... strange paradox thing.
I liked the fact that they had to let all the crims out though, that was kinda cool. And that Cruise was a drug user - it's about as dark as Spielberg's going to get.
He should have shot crow
The system works, the end.
The system works, the end.
Page: