The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
XBOX CPU= 733MHz, 150 million polygons/s
PS2 CPU = 294MHz, 20 million polygons/s, which is still impressive, but compared to XBOX...
and this is just a breif of advantages XBOX had...
And the shipping problem of PS2 hasnt helped. This is just what XBOX could of hoped for, as people get mad as they cant get a PS2, and will wait for the XBOX. So sorry SONY, but it seems like whatever Microsoft touches becomes GOLD, and you have had your turn...Its Microsofts NOW!!!
I also agree with what you are saying...BUT the fact is..XBOX is much more powerfull than the PS2....dAlthough MHz is not that important...look at the polygons it can produce..GRAPHICS = POLYGONS....
And please be honest..when you play PS2, you will notice that it's not really that POWERFUL!! All the hype has made people wanna buy it..but when u get it..u think..okay, theres a few less rough egdes..but its NOT a huge leap from the PSX and N64. However the XBOX will do 150Million polygons/s...That means the graphics will be XTREMELY GOOD!! And you will notice a huge diffrence in terms of graphics, speed(MHz), and power.
And whats this about no games!!!!!!
Have you not heard anything???
Metal Gear X is in development, Final Fantasy 10 is in development, and over 100 devleopers have gone with XBOX!!
But however, i do agree, it will be a while before it comes..so enjoy your PS2 while its here.
PS: The GAMECUBE will give XBOX a hard ride.
still it does come from the land of the free....god bless america; they were the first to do everything ever and they're the best at everything and every hero there ever was must have been an american and bigger is better and they don't have deep rooted social and handgun problems at all.
oops did I just say that?
>It is indeed a powerful machine.
So powerful, in fact that it overheats, that's why it's in such a chunky casing, and the Japanese think it is too big to fit in nicely with their living rooms.
meka_dragon PQMS8/00
(Gets out of the spaceship which has been keeping him away from his beloved forum!)
Ah, so it has arrived before my return. The gargantuan machine from planet Microsoft is here to sweep all before it!
Or is it........?
It is indeed a powerful machine, many polygons it can push. It is the very pinnacle of todays technology....... and that is where the flaw lies.
It is today. But if you actually listen to many a learned boffin talk, PS2 is tomorrow. For what Xbox can do today, it will still be doing the same 5 years down the line. But the PS2 is designed to exceed it's programming, to push past it's own boundaries, to learn as it grows.
Many have also slated the PS2 as being over-priced and over-hyped, well enter the Bill Gates show. Daily performances at a shopping mall near you.
I have no doubts in my mind that the Xbox will be a hit, but that does not mean that PS2 will be a miss.
I for one, think NOT!
I'm not hardcore but I've been into games for about 13 years; basically half my lifetime.
This MHz thing has been a recurring theme, particularly as an Amiga owner, where 50 Mhz means so much more than it does in a PC!
Even the original PS1 only has a 33Mhz processor, I believe.
When will people learn that the obsession with Mhz is a thing of evil perpetuated by those stupid Intel Inside tv ads!
We all know that efficient architecture, and
> innovation in both programming techniques and game design are the
> things that really count.
Unforfortunately 'we' don't all know, so you'll keep on seeing Mhz banded around like it's the only factor in consoles & PCs
meka_dragon PQMS8/00
Well if you're waiting for an XBOX, you're gonna have a looonnnngggg wait (and you thought waiting for your PS2 delivery was long).
News sources state that europe won't see any native units untill 2002.
Personally, as a 30something I prefer Sony games, having programmed PCs for nearly 10 years, I'd stay well away from any "games" architecture based on PC technology no matter how many go-faster stripes have been bolted on (the more complex the technology, the smaller the error required to defeat it, anyone with a high-end gaming PC knows this all too well). Microsoft tend to get things right in version 3 (and it was Microsoft who said that).
No thanks, I'll wait for the Z-Box, in the meantime, I'm playing great games and having fun.
One amazingly successful console doesn't immediately guarantee a second amazingly successful one.
PS2 may end up in every household; ps2 might be a flop.
So might X-Box, or Gamecube.
But in Five years time, it'll all start over again.
I guess everyone should just buy what they want, and enjoy it until the next generation.
By the way I have a PS2 and am impressed, but not as much as I'd hoped to be. Hopefully future games will deliver more of the promises that Sony made (and Microsoft is making now for x-box, incidentally - I guess everyone needs a little hype).
From what I can tell, X-box could be quite a piece of kit, and so is PS2; but coming from the world of C64s and Amigas, for me even PS1 and Sega Saturn were impressive!
On a final note; lets not compare Mhz that's the realm of dodgy high street salespeople trying to seperate you from your cash for a PC.
We all know that efficient architecture, and innovation in both programming techniques and game design are the things that really count.
Ok rant over bring on the flames.
im not against the XBOX and would very much like a look at it but until i see the proof its all just speculation best of luck to billy if it does take off but in the end it all comes down to how many people actually buy it and the quality and type of games they have that people like . i know of at least one good one already (Munches Oddesy) and that looks very good