Viewing Thread:
"Good web-design sites"

I need some sites with nice, clear, original web-design.

Can you guys help me find some?

I need some ideas for my IT project...

Turbonutter wrote:
> Although one of my favourite designs at the moment has to be
> tyla.org.uk, much to my disgust :D

Ahh! cheers Rob!
Though it's about to die due to me not bothering with the domain renewal next week... New site/URL and Host at the end of the month... Just finalising the new URL! Though tyla.org.uk will be available on http://tyla.port5.com at the begining of next week for a bit.

I'll tell you what, even if the site is badly designed...

They certainly know how to make a decent flash website!

Bloody hell that loading sequence looked good...

Best bit of Flash I've seen easily...

The site that impresses me the most at the moment is actually eBuyer's. Something clicks with me.

Although one of my favourite designs at the moment has to be tyla.org.uk, much to my disgust :D

Fog wrote:
> How can anyone think 2advanced.com is a bad website?
> Also they have both beuty and all the functions you could need + a lot
> more no doubt.
> It's their portfolio and it needs to be head turning unless your a
> fool obviously.

Actually... 2Advanced's website has been slated loads recently in the industry as being unusable and badly designed. A clear case of too much showing off. Although it does demonstrate their mastery of all things flash, it's still a poorly designed site. it may impress though Flash Evangelists, but it's not impressing anyone already in the industry..

BTW: Anyone seen macromedia's new site... It'a bad! Very Bad!

How can anyone think 2advanced.com is a bad website?
Also they have both beuty and all the functions you could need + a lot more no doubt.
It's their portfolio and it needs to be head turning unless your a fool obviously.

See my tagline.

NetWise is still under construction, and I am pondering over closing PCWise until NetWise is finished.

What a %£$#ing horrible website. Where's the need for all the flash garbage - all it does is make me wait for it to load, and force the restriction that it only occupies about a 1/4 of browser window (think it's bad at 1024x768? Try 1600x1200). They could have cut all the expensive graphics and made a site twice as functional, four times faster for an eight the price.

Having said all that it does fit the purpose of the site - to demonstrate a design companies l337 skillZ, but imagine if you had to wait that long for Hotmail to load..

Actually, the more I think about it, the font size is fine, it's just that they're too tightly packed together that's making me squint.

1024x768.

All looks fine to me, what res you using?