The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I've decided that I need a hobby. I've picked web design. The problem is I know very little about it. I tought myself basic html (The stuff you can learn in a day)and I'm now trying to improve on that.
My question is, to be a good web designer what do I need to teach myself. The list of things I want to teach myself at the moment is:
xHTML
CSS
Javascript
other things I've heard about and I think I might need to know are:
Java
C (or C++, or whatever it is)
CGI
I don't really know much at all, so If you could explain what things I need to learn and why.
I want to be able to design semi-professional web pages by the end of the year, but I would also like advice on where to go after that. Which order should I teach myself in etc.
All help appreciated. I know this sounds a bit confused, but thats because I don't really know what I'm doing, which is why I'm asking for help.
Thanks
My question is, to be a good web designer what do I need to teach myself. The list of things I want to teach myself at the moment is:
xHTML
CSS
Javascript
other things I've heard about and I think I might need to know are:
Java
C (or C++, or whatever it is)
CGI
I don't really know much at all, so If you could explain what things I need to learn and why.
I want to be able to design semi-professional web pages by the end of the year, but I would also like advice on where to go after that. Which order should I teach myself in etc.
All help appreciated. I know this sounds a bit confused, but thats because I don't really know what I'm doing, which is why I'm asking for help.
Thanks
Page:
I know about tables and frames.
I think I know most basic HTML now.
thanks for everyones comments. I'm taking them all on board.
and that webmonkey site is great
I think I know most basic HTML now.
thanks for everyones comments. I'm taking them all on board.
and that webmonkey site is great
If you are interested in making interactive 'rich' media websites then look into Flash and Actionscript, as the rewards do pay off later.
Unfortunately Flash is expensive so if you you are interested in using it either 'find' a copy or just get SWiSH which is cheaper and simpler to use (but has less flashy results).
Oh and make sure the host you choose supports PHP and SQL if you are going to use those languages.
Unfortunately Flash is expensive so if you you are interested in using it either 'find' a copy or just get SWiSH which is cheaper and simpler to use (but has less flashy results).
Oh and make sure the host you choose supports PHP and SQL if you are going to use those languages.
I have set up a site which teaches you the basics of web design, and if you are like me, you will try to experiment with the code to learn new things. I read very little and was taught very little when I started my first site. It is very easy to work things out ofr yourself, just playing around with letters and code.
One of my most popular websites to date is NetWise. It is still under construction, and currently offers stuff which I would consider very basic, although these things may be quite advanced for you. No offense meant! Anyway, take a look at the site, clickon some of the available links and give it a good read through.
http://netwise.tk
Basically, all you need to make a good site is:
- A fairly basic understanding
- The will to make one
- A web browser
- Microsoft Notepad, MS DOS or WordPad
One of my most popular websites to date is NetWise. It is still under construction, and currently offers stuff which I would consider very basic, although these things may be quite advanced for you. No offense meant! Anyway, take a look at the site, clickon some of the available links and give it a good read through.
http://netwise.tk
Basically, all you need to make a good site is:
- A fairly basic understanding
- The will to make one
- A web browser
- Microsoft Notepad, MS DOS or WordPad
cjh wrote:
If you take a look at:
> http://ukchatforums.com/display_forums.php?groupid=2
> ... and then ...
> http://www.chrisjhaig.co.uk/SR_Sample/
And that's a bad example of correct use of xHTML and CSS1/2
Now for some Correct uses of CSS/xHTML including pseudo classes and contextual identifiers:
http://www.blackwellpublshing.com/socialpolicy
(validates against xHTML 1.0 Transitional, though there are a few no-no's with non correct use of special charachters)
or
http://wip.blackwellpublishing.com/wwwsubjsitescorp
(there's a slight issue in IE5 re the last two boxes in the centre column, but this is about as complex as your gonna get with CSS/xHTML)
If you take a look at:
> http://ukchatforums.com/display_forums.php?groupid=2
> ... and then ...
> http://www.chrisjhaig.co.uk/SR_Sample/
And that's a bad example of correct use of xHTML and CSS1/2
Now for some Correct uses of CSS/xHTML including pseudo classes and contextual identifiers:
http://www.blackwellpublshing.com/socialpolicy
(validates against xHTML 1.0 Transitional, though there are a few no-no's with non correct use of special charachters)
or
http://wip.blackwellpublishing.com/wwwsubjsitescorp
(there's a slight issue in IE5 re the last two boxes in the centre column, but this is about as complex as your gonna get with CSS/xHTML)
Just how bad are we talking here??
Oh, and the first link doesn't appear to work. But the second link works and looks good, is it the same sort of thing as the first link should be??
Oh, and the first link doesn't appear to work. But the second link works and looks good, is it the same sort of thing as the first link should be??
cjh wrote:
> Just how bad are we talking here??
>
> Oh, and the first link doesn't appear to work. But the second link
> works and looks good, is it the same sort of thing as the first link
> should be??
Chat
No need for the class in the link, you could define it instead using:
#Top-Upper-Links-Bar a:link {
}
Same goes for all of the others such as
#Main-Nav-Bar a:link {
}
Then theres:
Why not use and remeber, when using span NN4 reders it as block and not inline, to get around this
span {display:inline;}
then...
... why?
The side navigation.. Give it more context for non CSS browsers buy using a list instead. Set the padding and margin to 0 and it'll hide the bullet point. For example
#leftnav li {
margin:0px;
padding:0px;
}
When a non CSS browser hits the page, at least the nave will look like a nav in list form instead of a huge line of links.
There's more to CSS/xHTML than just "making it" You still have to consider the effect on non CSS clients such as NN4 and it should still be useable.
"Special Reserve Prices and Reviews" should be contained in an tag same as "Free Unlimited Web Space" again to give it context.
Try this too:
The "basic" css file is for basic CSS supporting browsers such as NN4 & IE4. NN^+ IE5+ and Moz recognice "@import" which allows them to import the details of "advanced.css". Older browsers will just ignore this. This gives you greater control over browser versions. In "basic.css", you define the body and body text, everything else goe into "advanced.css".
Finally... for proper use, add: media="screen"
> Just how bad are we talking here??
>
> Oh, and the first link doesn't appear to work. But the second link
> works and looks good, is it the same sort of thing as the first link
> should be??
Chat
No need for the class in the link, you could define it instead using:
#Top-Upper-Links-Bar a:link {
}
Same goes for all of the others such as
#Main-Nav-Bar a:link {
}
Then theres:
Why not use and remeber, when using span NN4 reders it as block and not inline, to get around this
span {display:inline;}
then...
... why?
The side navigation.. Give it more context for non CSS browsers buy using a list instead. Set the padding and margin to 0 and it'll hide the bullet point. For example
#leftnav li {
margin:0px;
padding:0px;
}
When a non CSS browser hits the page, at least the nave will look like a nav in list form instead of a huge line of links.
There's more to CSS/xHTML than just "making it" You still have to consider the effect on non CSS clients such as NN4 and it should still be useable.
"Special Reserve Prices and Reviews" should be contained in an
Try this too:
The "basic" css file is for basic CSS supporting browsers such as NN4 & IE4. NN^+ IE5+ and Moz recognice "@import" which allows them to import the details of "advanced.css". Older browsers will just ignore this. This gives you greater control over browser versions. In "basic.css", you define the body and body text, everything else goe into "advanced.css".
Finally... for proper use, add: media="screen"
cjh wrote:
> Oh, and the first link doesn't appear to work.
http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/socialpolicy
> Oh, and the first link doesn't appear to work.
http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/socialpolicy
hhmm, when you said bad, you didn't mean a bad as I was expecting :)
Thanks for the corrections and tips,
One thing though, about the media="screen" bit. Did you mean within the area or within the
Thanks for the corrections and tips,
One thing though, about the media="screen" bit. Did you mean within the area or within the
It appears you are using an old browser, as such, some parts of the Freeola and Getdotted site will not work as intended. Using the latest version of your browser, or another browser such as Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Opera will provide a better, safer browsing experience for you.