Viewing Thread:
"A Question I've been giving some thought to"

If you could go back in time to the day that Hitler was born and kill him, would you do it?

What I want to know though, is why, men aren't allowed to hit woman (Guy rule Number 2) but woman are allowed to hit men. WHA?

If you've ever played COmmand And COnquer Red Alert thoguh, Einstein kills hitler with TIme machine, and, as there is no-one to stop Stalins expansion to the West, an even bigger war breaks out. DO you see?

"If you kill evil, an even bigger evil will take it's place."
Uncle, Jackie Chan Adventures.

if the film, ''the time machine'' is correct, then all those killed due to Hitler would have died at the same time, but in a different way...

Even though it's fiction, it seems realistic enough

Refering to trhe original question, I think that if it could be prooved that Hitler was soley responsable for WWI and WWII then yes I would to prevent millions of innocent people dying. Those that say no, imagine if Saddam Hussain launched chemical attacks across the world, and your loved ones, friends+family died...would you wish you could go back and kill him???

However it makes you wonder if there were people in Germany that held a higher power than he did and told him what to say/do so killing him may not have solved the problem.

I doubt very much that the killing of one man would've stopped the anti-semetic and racist menace that was brooding in Germany in the 1930s.

BEARDS. wrote:
> And is a primary cause of the sexism you were just complaining about.

What would you know, your just a man

:Þ

okay I've taken this too far now......

*goes away*

And is a primary cause of the sexism you were just complaining about.

The worst thing is when you see parents smacking their kids. A lady can defend herself against an attacker, but kids are practically defenseless (except Kevin McCallister - he my hero). Smacking only teaches that violence is the answer.

Insane Bartender wrote:

> It's a nice defence, but it doesn't work, when you consider that all
> it does is make us hate women in general, and just leads the majority
> of men to use women as non-commital objects.

Unfortunatly its what I always resort to during arguments.

RosaIind wrote:
> Did you never figure that we mis-interpret on purpose?

It's a nice defence, but it doesn't work, when you consider that all it does is make us hate women in general, and just leads the majority of men to use women as non-commital objects.