The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'The Outfit'.
The Outfit:
[URL]http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/648/648782p1.html[/URL]
Destructable Environments.
Destruction on Demand.
Its Mercenaries but in WWII.
*Drools*
[URL]http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/648/648782p1.html[/URL]
Destructable Environments.
Destruction on Demand.
Its Mercenaries but in WWII.
*Drools*
Page:
Hedfix wrote:
> Then you wrote:
>
> Bonus wrote:
> Other than the fact that the game glorifies war and demeans the
> life-threatening job soldiers in the field have to carry out.
>
>
> Lesson: Don't widen your argument unless you can back it up.
>
>
>
> Simple really.
> Then you wrote:
>
> Bonus wrote:
> Other than the fact that the game glorifies war and demeans the
> life-threatening job soldiers in the field have to carry out.
>
>
> Lesson: Don't widen your argument unless you can back it up.
>
>
>
> Simple really.
Bonus wrote:
> Bonus wrote:
> [B]It's got nothing to do with the rights and wrongs of war itself
> but
> using it to milk money out of people and turning it into franchised
> games.[/B}
:D
Close tags 'mr programmer'.
> Bonus wrote:
> [B]It's got nothing to do with the rights and wrongs of war itself
> but
> using it to milk money out of people and turning it into franchised
> games.[/B}
:D
Close tags 'mr programmer'.
Bonus wrote:
> [B]It's got nothing to do with the rights and wrongs of war itself but
> using it to milk money out of people and turning it into franchised
> games.[/B}
> [B]It's got nothing to do with the rights and wrongs of war itself but
> using it to milk money out of people and turning it into franchised
> games.[/B}
Bonus wrote:
> I'm not interested in your stupid remarks and thinking you know what
> you're talking about.
>
> I can't be @rsed annoyed arguing about something as fundamental as
> whether or not the lives and deaths of innocent soldiers sent into
> battle should be glorified and the severe risk to their lives
> belittled by capitalist games companies such as EA etc. hoping to
> make a quick buck off of the climate of war we find ourselves in.
>
> If you have a problem with that, go blow a goat, I don't care. Any
> teenager styled personal retort will be met with the dignified
> silence it deserves.
And yet you admire EA so much...
*Shrugs*
Fly off the handle if you must because you tried to claim 'all wars are bad'.
> I'm not interested in your stupid remarks and thinking you know what
> you're talking about.
>
> I can't be @rsed annoyed arguing about something as fundamental as
> whether or not the lives and deaths of innocent soldiers sent into
> battle should be glorified and the severe risk to their lives
> belittled by capitalist games companies such as EA etc. hoping to
> make a quick buck off of the climate of war we find ourselves in.
>
> If you have a problem with that, go blow a goat, I don't care. Any
> teenager styled personal retort will be met with the dignified
> silence it deserves.
And yet you admire EA so much...
*Shrugs*
Fly off the handle if you must because you tried to claim 'all wars are bad'.
Bonus wrote:
> If you have a problem with that, go blow a goat, I don't care.
---
This one does.
> If you have a problem with that, go blow a goat, I don't care.
---
This one does.
Yes we do need more WWII games that glorify war and death and smashed Nazis.
I'd buy a game called "Kill all Nazis" simply for the title - but when I get awesome goodness like in Call of Duty, Brothers in Arms, Hidden & Dangerous 2 and Allied Assault (from Normandy to the snow-levels only) then that's even better.
More. More GI slaughter games please.
I'd buy a game called "Kill all Nazis" simply for the title - but when I get awesome goodness like in Call of Duty, Brothers in Arms, Hidden & Dangerous 2 and Allied Assault (from Normandy to the snow-levels only) then that's even better.
More. More GI slaughter games please.
I'm not interested in your stupid remarks and thinking you know what you're talking about.
I can't be @rsed annoyed arguing about something as fundamental as whether or not the lives and deaths of innocent soldiers sent into battle should be glorified and the severe risk to their lives belittled by capitalist games companies such as EA etc. hoping to make a quick buck off of the climate of war we find ourselves in.
If you have a problem with that, go blow a goat, I don't care. Any teenager styled personal retort will be met with the dignified silence it deserves.
I can't be @rsed annoyed arguing about something as fundamental as whether or not the lives and deaths of innocent soldiers sent into battle should be glorified and the severe risk to their lives belittled by capitalist games companies such as EA etc. hoping to make a quick buck off of the climate of war we find ourselves in.
If you have a problem with that, go blow a goat, I don't care. Any teenager styled personal retort will be met with the dignified silence it deserves.
Then you wrote:
Bonus wrote:
> Other than the fact that the game glorifies war and demeans the
> life-threatening job soldiers in the field have to carry out.
Lesson: Don't widen your argument unless you can back it up.
Simple really.
Bonus wrote:
> Other than the fact that the game glorifies war and demeans the
> life-threatening job soldiers in the field have to carry out.
Lesson: Don't widen your argument unless you can back it up.
Simple really.
Bonus wrote:
> Do we really need more World War 2 games flooding the market and
> glorifying an era which saw millions killed, persecuted and treated
> like mere animals?
>
> I doubt it.
Simple really.
> Do we really need more World War 2 games flooding the market and
> glorifying an era which saw millions killed, persecuted and treated
> like mere animals?
>
> I doubt it.
Simple really.
It's kind of difficult to get 'the point' when it's not actually been written in the post you're reading.
Page: