The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I like the old style of just having two shows, one title.
> That's fingers crossed he DOESN'T mess it up, btw.
he probly will mess it up hes already messing up raw with all this triple h **** thats going on
I think there will be 15 from RAW and 15 from Smackdown entered in. But think, theres a world title for RAW and a world title for Smackdown.
I guess that if a RAW superstar wins the Rumble then they will get the main event spot against the RAW world champ at Wrestlemania, or if a Smackdown superstar wins, they get the main event spot at Wrestlemania against the Smackdown world champ.
Ive heard rumours that the split is going to be joined back together again so maybe at the PPV in February, they will have a match to join both the world titles and then whoever wins at the Rumble faces the winner of that match.
But what would happen to the other world title if that didnt happen? How would they choose a #1 contender for that title to face the champ at Wrestlemania? Maybe they could even have two mini-royal rumbles. One for the RAW superstars and one for the Smackdown superstars and then Wrestlemania there will be a double main event.
But I dunno, I would like there to be one world champ and so the idea of the two world champs facing off at the February PPV (which stands at HHH Vs Kurt right now, a promising match) to crown the true world champ and then the winner of the rumble (be it a RAW superstar or a Smackdown superstar) gets to face the world champ at Wrestlemania.
However it turns out though, im looking forward to it. It definately seems like Wrestlemania will be the climax for a true champ though and it should be a great match.
Hopefully we will hear how the Royal Rumble will be done and how it will effect the Wrestlemania main event.
:-)